The Two Faces of Hillary Clinton

This one shouldn’t surprise you:

CANTERBURY, N.H. — Hillary Rodham Clinton called Barack Obama naive when he said he’d meet with the leaders of Iran without precondition.

But her comments Thursday on the issue prompted him to question whether she’s changed her mind.

During a Democratic presidential debate in July, Obama said he would be willing to meet without precondition in the first year of his presidency with the leaders of Iran, Syria, Venezuela, Cuba and North Korea.

Standing with him on stage, Clinton said she would first send envoys to test the waters and called Obama’s position irresponsible and naive.

But asked about it Thursday by a voter, the New York senator said twice that she, too, would negotiate with Iran “with no conditions.”

“I would engage in negotiations with Iran, with no conditions, because we don’t really understand how Iran works. We think we do, from the outside, but I think that is misleading,” she said at an apple orchard.

This basically tells me that Hillary has no more of  a clue than what she accuses Obama of not having, which would lead me to conclude that most obviously she would HAVE to rely on Bill in order to run her administration. Personally I get a chuckle thinking about Bill being a first lady.