Did Hillary’s private email server lead to the death of Ambassador Stevens?

The revelations coming out about Hillary Clinton’s use of an insecure email server during her time as Secretary of State may have cost Ambassador Christopher Stevens his life. The damning evidence which continues to pour out of the email contents being released bit by bit from the State Department is starting to piece together a very, very disconcerting national security nightmare.

The American Thinker reports:

Putting together the information now publicly available, the question has to be asked: Did an ISIS hack of Hillary Clinton’s virtually defenseless home brew server set up the death of Ambassador Christopher Stevens?

ISIS has proven itself adept enough at information technology that a successful hack of Hillary Clinton’s server at her Chappaqua mansion cannot be ruled out, no matter how many Secret Service members stood guard. Apparently unbeknownst to the former secretary of state who boasted of the server’s security because of the guards outside, it is so easy to hack a garden variety server set up by a mom-and-pop operation that an ISIS (and Russian intelligence and Chinese and Romanian and many other agencies) hack is well within the realm of possibility.

As more and more comes out, we’re learning that not only did Hillary Clinton send and receive information deemed classified, her system could have been hacked over time leading to intelligence breaches of untold proportions.

The New York Post picks up the story:

US intelligence officials so far have determined that at least four — and as many as 305 — of the more than 30,000 emails Clinton and her aides have printed out and turned over to investigators were classified at the time they were written.

They include a 2011 message from Clinton’s top aides that contains military intelligence from United States Africa Command gleaned from satellite images of troop movements in Libya, along with the travel and protection plans for Ambassador Christopher Stevens, who was later killed in a terrorist attack in Benghazi, Libya. Another staff ­email sent to Clinton in 2012 contained investigative data about Benghazi terrorist suspects wanted by the FBI. [Emphasis added]

Both emails were classified TS/SI — Top Secret/Special Intelligence — and required the nation’s highest security clearance to read. SI is a control system within the supersecret designation known as Sensitive Compartmented Information.

This scenario could have setup a leak which led to the death of a US Ambassador, and three other Americans, on September 11, 2012, in Benghazi, Libya. I stress the would could, since there is no direct evidence yet to fully connect all the dots. The larger scope, if you back up a few steps, is the entire reason why classified information, including security details and travel plans, are not to be stored on servers outside of stringent government control.

We don’t yet know why Hillary Clinton is attempting to curtail any and all questions about her private email server. Initial speculation had to do with influence peddling through the Clinton Foundation, and that may also be part of it. Perhaps, however, there is an even more sinister reason for her to keep this issue under wraps.

  • Ligaya Barlow

    Well that’s what everyone thinks, right? Why else wipe the server clean?

  • leeann


    • Bill Senior

      Stupid is as stupid does and says, duh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Gina Hoffland

    Yes, most decidedly yes! It surely didn’t protect the Embassador and his employees! Why else would Hillary be so protective of her e-mails, the servers, and everything else she so surreptitiously did during that time? And, when she denies anything that she did wrong, she flatly denies it. It’s like hearing Bill Clinton all over again, saying, “I did not have sex with that woman” when he DID! Both of them have always though they were above everyone else, and can do anything, demanding Special Treatment, and if anything in question, that the U.S. Citizens are supposed to look the other way. So much for a “free country,” and corruption in America. Everyone is supposed to look the other way, and elect her President now? She and her husband have some guts! And, don’t kid yourselves. Her husband and his crownies are helping her smudge any servers and papers before they come out in the open, kind-of like the Louise Lerner deal.

  • Gina Hoffland

    “Attack on U.S. mission in Benghazi – Attackers set the U.S. mission in Benghazi, Libya, on fire on September 11, 2012. The U.S. ambassador to Libya, Christopher Stevens, and three other U.S. nationals were killed during the attack.” Hillary was doing her classified State Dept. business on her private cell phone and servers. Why would Hillary act so surreptitious and be so protective of her her e-mails, her texts on her cell phone, and her private server? When she flatly denies that she’s done anything wrong, It’s like hearing Bill Clinton say all over again, “I did not have sex with that woman!” Both of them have always thought they were above and beyond everyone else, including those “others” who don’t agree with them. They can do anything; demanding and expecting Special Treatment from the country and all its citizens, doing business in a ‘mom and pop’ way, simply, because they are “them.” They’ve been having this pattern since the Arkansas days, and even going back way then. It’s a modus operandi. So much for a “free country,” and corruption in America. Is everyone now just supposed to look the other way, and elect her for President anyway? She and her husband have become powerful people. And, power can be good, depending on who is using it. No doubt, her husband and his cronies are helping her smudge and “doctor up” any servers and e-mails that were sent, kind of like the Louise Lerner e-mails that disappeared, and showed up again later, altered and smudged over. The funny thing is, that Hillary was one of the prosecution team members during the Nixon persecution, during the White House hearings to oust him. And now, fast forward 43 years later, when Hillary has potentially done worse, she’s acting like a Presidential Pollyanna, that the American people is supposed to adore and elect? Would the U.S. ambassador to Libya, Paul Stevens, and the three others have voted for her as the next 2016 U.S. president?

  • RogelioinFL

    Well first of all the entire administration is to blame for the death of Ambassador Stevens. For them to place an openly gay man into a dangerous country and area of the world was the first mistake, now remember there are no gays in Iran for example, right? as stated per their head of state….hmmm… the second mistake is that shame on the media for not telling the ENTIRE truth of EVERYTHING the attackers did to his body prior to his death. Finally, I’m sure the server held valid intelligence content on the unrest in the region and in Libya which maybe could have saved these precious lives.

  • Jeff Whitaker

    Just more Republican and Independent lies!!!! #Feelthehill!!!

  • Jeff Whitaker

    Ban the Bengahzi Committee, liars and frauds!!!

  • Jeff Whitaker

    No more Trey!!!

  • Bill Senior

    Why the hell wouldn’t it “have not” contributed to it, duh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    The Killer’s knew the US wasn’t going to come in Militarily to Benghazi, so they … went in and killed the 4 Americans and wiped out the Embassy … unscathed!!!!

    Hillary Clinton because it was “On Her Watch” …. should be charged with the Murders and Embassy Destruction, PERIOD!!!!