Former border agents: Immigration flood is ‘orchestrated’

As I touched on a few days ago, there appears to be a coordinated effort behind the scenes which is driving thousands of children and teenagers to leave their home countries in Central and South America to seek amnesty in the United States.

After witnessing what has been occurring in recent months, a group called the National Association of Former Border Patrol Officers (NAFBPO) is sounding an alarm calling this influx an “orchestrated and contrived assault.”

In a statement released on June 10, NAFBPO says the following in reference to the recent influx of children crossing the border:

“This is not a humanitarian crisis. It is a predictable, orchestrated and contrived assault on the compassionate side of Americans by her political leaders that knowingly puts minor Illegal Alien children at risk for purely political purposes.”

The term “orchestrated” is one I’ve been uttering in recent days because it appears as more evidence comes forward, there is in fact a coordinated effort between many Central American countries to push children toward the Southern border of the United States. According to news reports, some countries are advertising that amnesty will be granted to children crossing the U.S. border:

KRGV Channel 5, in the border town of McAllen, Texas, reported that migrants from Central American countries like Guatemala are hearing news reports at home that mothers with children are being welcomed in the U.S. with plane and bus tickets to the interior. [Emphasis added]

And where are the news outlets in Central America getting the idea that the U.S. is open to all comers?

From the White House, says Texas Sen. Ted Cruz.

“It is a direct consequence of the presidents illegal actions,” he said, according to Breitbart. “The parents think, ‘If I send my child [to the U.S.], my child will have amnesty.’ That’s what the president of the U.S. has said. It is the exact opposite of a humane approach to immigration or to securing our borders.”

Currently there is a perfect storm of U.S. immigration policy, economic conditions in Central America, and a desire by many U.S. politicians to see some form of immigration reform passed which includes amnesty for millions of illegal aliens. In this scenario, thousands of these children are being sent, by their families and home governments, to the United States with the hope that they will be granted amnesty and their families will also be welcome into the country behind them.

The Obama administration’s response has not been a desire to stem the tide and end the danger to these children, rather it has been a behind-the-scenes operation to feed and house them on U.S. Military bases around the country. As Michelle Malkin noted, destinations as far away as Massachusetts are being setup to accept the influx of children:

A source tipped me off last week to a curious occurrence: It seems that two planeloads of illegal aliens were recently shipped to Massachusetts. The first reportedly landed at Hanscom Air Force Base in Bedford. According to my tipster, approximately 160 illegal immigrants arrived on that flight and stayed nearly a week before being transferred to a Department of Homeland Security site and then released.

The second flight reportedly was diverted from Hanscom to Boston’s Logan Airport this past weekend. I am told that both Massachusetts and New Hampshire officials were on hand. I reached out to Hanscom AFB for confirmation, but did not receive a call back by my deadline.

The federal government appears to have no inclination in ushering an end to this influx since news of catch-and-release by Homeland Security will surely produce more illegal immigration.

  • Bill Hedges

    Tea wants to be THE VOICE OF REASON. BLAST illegals OUT OF THIS COUNTRY. All millions upon millions of them.

    Ted Cruz is praised as VOICE OF REASON in Nate’s article. No amnesty with Ted, NEITHER massive BOOT. NOW WITH next Bush in line you get, legal illegals NOW illegal, KNOT the stuffing from their doll. With Rand you get EGGROLL, amnesty…. Bring signs of heart attack upon his Father.

    The PEANUT tea GALLERY frowned against BEST ANSWER to this 1800’s growing volcano pressure cooker. First cork the holes then address the overflow in USA. YOU CAN’T EXPELL MULTI MILLION. Learn from Reagan’s amnesty & how TEDDY destroyed mechanism to keep boarder LEAK PROOF.

    From there amnesty or NOT, UNDER WHAT CONDION, etc.., can go forth. Why MUST we endure ??? Todd Akins GOOD example. Loss of MOST NEEDED SEATS. Woman who got seat Todd SHOULD HAVE WON, voted for USA to ban guns by UN direction. Thank goodness was voted DOWN. Folks like bob STAYED HOME election day giving us buma’s second term. May not like Romney, I sure didn’t, but Romney is but a block busting bomb disaster in WH, while buma gone NUCLEAR devastation…

    Compromise. Founding Fathers bread & butter. Compromise. Newt’s ability to lower debt, shirk government WITHOUT majority in House, Senate, and ownership of WH…

    Immigration will get settled by executive order OTHERWISE. Reid says before November. Be nice TO HAVE ROMNEY in WH about NOW. Thanks for NOT VOTING people with misguided principle…

  • Bob

    “I hold that a little rebellion now and then is a good thing and as necessary in the political world as storms in the physical.”…….Thomas Jefferson

    The above could just as well have been said after the Eric Cantor defeat. Calling AMNESTY by the name “immigration reform” as is the want of some of our political leaders will not change the nature of the beast nor will attempting to put lip stick on it with trivial requirements change the determining criteria for citizenship. Come 2016 with the presidential election on the line you can bet Congressional republicans will be falling all over themselves attempting to convince the American public the borders are secure and the “ILLEGAL ALIENS CAN BECOME CITIZENS”. Why? Not because they have the countries best wishes for security but to perpetuate their existence in Washington as the dominating party. They look at it as a shot in the arm while the public look at it as a shot to the head.

    As Pat Buchanan pointed out Russian President Putin is currently standing for Russian sovereignty by his moves in the Ukraine. China is playing the nationalist card by claiming ownership of vast areas of the Pacific. What is America doing? It’s being conquered. By relying on the personal whims of politicians to determine what is beneficial you’re giving the country away.

  • Bill Hedges

    Obviously defeat of Eric Cantor is a WIN FOR tea.

    OR IS IT ???!!!???

    UNEXPECTED win. Financial backing never materialized in much quantity.

    MORE LIKE THE band wagon JUMPED ABOARDS ONCE what his name WON.

    TEA wants to point to IMMIGRATION for Cantor loss. THE SPARK to _A_ TEA resurgence from YEARS OF DROUGHT in popularity decline. With Tea on its’ LAST LEGS. Tea grasping for a life preserver as they sink.

    bob must speak of Pat Buchanan NOT Rand NOR Ted. You see neither support bob view on immigration. NOT EVEN Pat Buchanan TWO CENTS relates to immigration DIRECTLY. Only in SOME mystical sense.

    America is bleeding with illegals pouring in. With principled FOLKS LIKE BOB staying home allowing second terms for the likes of buma, THERE WILL BE no boarders with iron clad closure AS BEST as humanly possible.

    Back to BIG WIN for TEA ???!!!???

    1. “How national tea party groups missed the David Brat boat”

    “David Brat’s surprise victory Tuesday over House Majority Leader Eric Cantor was quickly embraced by the tea party movement – especially national tea party groups that have been looking to score a big win in their battle against GOP incumbents this cycle.”

    “Leaders of the Tea Party Patriots quickly chimed in on Twitter:”

    Madison Project’s Daniel Horowitz GROUP PRAISED WIN with “((( ZERO )))” $$$ SUPPORT. AS article POINTS OUT:

    “The fact that Brat took off without the help of those organizations now makes it harder for them to claim his victory as their own.”

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/06/10/how-national-tea-party-groups-missed-the-david-brat-boat/

    2. “Cantor, 51, has been in Congress for more than 13 years now. But in all that time, his only close election was his first one: the 2000 Republican primary, which he won by less than one percentage point”

    WHAT CHANGED ???:

    “Virginia’s districts were redrawn in 2010”

    DETAILS in article.

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/what-went-wrong-for-eric-cantor/2014/06/11/0be7c02c-f180-11e3-914c-1fbd0614e2d4_story.html

    BIG WIN for tea ??? IN THEIR dreams.

    bob’s TEA dwindles with each turn on a wrong way ONE WAY STREET.

    Attempt to steal GLORY is pathetic. Tea groups mere parasites sucking nourishment from host…

  • Bob

    I’m almost moved to the point of tears for the feign of the lefts concern for the political future of the republican party as they assist with the said immolation. Columnist like Donna Brazil, E.J. Dionne and Eugene Robinson all of the LEFT WING WASHINGTON POST lamented about how the Tea Party is dragging the republicans down.

    And the establishment republicans buy into it hook line and sinker. Everything from “crossover votes, to re-districting has been given as an excuse. Rather than believe it was a “vote of no confidence” from the base and constituents they continue to woo crony capitalism dollars and votes they will never receive. Immediatly following the election Sen. Thad Cochran who is fighting for his own political career in a runoff election said “I had no idea Eric Cantor lost” and possible Majority Leader Congressmen Kevin McCarthy supposedly told lobbyist at the Chamber of Commerce “Don’t worry it’ll be business as usual in the House.”

    Was it orchestrated by the Tea Party? No not really but as I have said before and a number of people here can’t seem to grasp this the strength of the Tea Party is it’s lack of any central organization but depending on it’s grassroots. Inevitably self appointed Tea party leaders will arise as will organizations claiming ownership and will undermine the ideas and constrain the potential of the movement. We must continue to frame every debate around the Constitution, first principles and rule of law.

    William Kristol called the establishment “Dead Broke Leaders” and indeed they are if they continue to pretend the Eric Cantor debacle didn’t happen or was of no significance.

  • Bill Hedges

    bob wrote:

    “Columnist like Donna Brazil, E.J. Dionne and Eugene Robinson all of the LEFT WING WASHINGTON POST lamented about how the Tea Party is dragging the republicans down.”

    “And the establishment republicans buy into it hook line and sinker.”

    NO fishing gear here. Have posted result sowing the seeds that germinate THAT TRUTH. ((( WTH LINK )))Using DATA RELEASED BY GALLUP POLL ON THE never-ending popularity of Tea FLOWING DOWN Niagara Falls. Last poll coordinated drop of Republican popularity with far more drop with Tea, as Ted Cruz foolishly did his battle over debt, etc.

    Mystic POWERS IS bob answer to ignore evidence. Cantor worse election, previous to last, was his first. He did well afterwards. In 2010 there was redistricting. Cantor loss recent election.

    The POWER of Tea DOES NOT COMPEL ( MOCKING a demon movie ), ignoring sane reasoning. Tea is in a falling sinkhole. NOT EVEN Rand Paul & Ted Cruz bit bob’s immigration APPLE.

    bob brings back his cartoon animation:

    “pretend the Eric Cantor debacle didn’t happen or was of no significance”

    I’d like to read the quotes in context & verify accuracy BUT bob provides NO LINK to his _ mis·cel·la·ne·ous _ quotes gotten off site.

    OR:

    “Say it isn’t so JOE” quote ONLY APPLIES to ONE BALL PLAYER.

    bob wrote:

    “Was it orchestrated by the Tea Party? No not really…”

    MY PROOF & POINT was Tea groups tried to say THEY DID !!!! _ Dis·in·gen·u·ous_ AS bob …

  • Bill Hedges

    Many a follower of RON Paul is LOYAL, WITH SOME, refusing to vote election day without his name on the ballot. Now HIS SON holds some 180 degree opposing views SUCH AS immigration.

    COMPROMISE, in THEIR WORLD, is a smite to their integrity. In a old SATURDAY NIGHT LIVE continuous skit, was better TO LOOK GOOD than FEEL GOOD. In Ron and followers view, Complain, accomplish VERY LITTLE mostly trivial, & in MANY CASES STAY HOME ON vote day.

    Ron Paul STOOD FOR _ pre·ten·tious _ PRINCIPLE when ALL was for NOT:

    “Ron Paul’s House record stands out for its futility and tenacity”

    “The passage of H.R. 2121, in fall 2009, unfolded without drama. It allowed for the sale of a customhouse in Galveston, Tex. The House debate took two minutes, and the vote took eight seconds. The ayes had it.”

    “But something historic was happening. On his 482nd try, Rep. Ron Paul (R-Tex.) had authored a bill that would become law.”

    “Paul has become a surprising force in the Republican presidential race, promising to use “the bully pulpit of the presidency” to demand deep cutbacks across government. But Paul has had only limited success using his current pulpit — a seat in Congress — to rally lawmakers behind his ideas.”

    “Of the 620 measures that Paul has sponsored, just four have made it to a vote on the House floor. Only that one has been signed into law.”

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/ron-pauls-house-record-stands-out-for-its-futility-and-tenacity/2011/12/23/gIQA5ioVJP_story.html

    WONDER WHY Rand Paul REJECTS his Father’s PATH…

    FOR Ron:

    “Alone, alone, all all alone, Alone on a wide wide sea! And never a saint took pity on My soul in agony”

    Samuel Taylor Coleridge

  • Bob

    Hmmmm…Three links given……ALL FROM THE WASHINGTON POST!

    Perhaps you believe in compromising with MODERATE DEMOCRATS TO A POINT THAT YOU ARE STARTING TO BELIEVE THEIR PROPAGANDA?

    http://www.usnews.com/dims4/USNEWS/2156aa0/2147483647/thumbnail/766×511%3E/quality/85/?url=%2Fcmsmedia%2Fdb%2F17c88c6afbe721418418846cab12a5%2F1100-13

  • Bill Hedges

    WHEN I USED Huffington you complained AS YOU DO NOW. However, when NATE used Huffington sometime afterwards, YOU CLAIMED UP.

    IS VERY SIMPLE. WHATEVER the source, disprove the material IF YOU CAN BECAUSE you disagree.

    Democrats are Americans in GOOD STANDING. Some ARE church goers, gun owners, even some against abortion. Not all gay. There ARE CONSERVATIVE as well as Tea Democrats.

    Your conclusion IS _ pet·u·lant _…

  • Bob

    When J.D. used the Washington Post or New York Times as a source on this site you were the first one to claim (not clam)it wasn’t acceptable because it was from a liberal site.

    “Democrats are Americans in GOOD STANDING”??????

    You’ve gone to the dark side Luke”

  • Bill Hedges

    Now PROVE:

    “When J.D. used the Washington Post or New York Times as a source on this site you were the first one to claim (not clam)it wasn’t acceptable because it was from a liberal site”
    _____

    No wonder when bob wrote this I took it with a GRAIN OF SALT. That was over-valuing:

    Bob June 10, 2014 at 10:45 am

    “I have a problem conferring with or even taking serious any contributor to this or any other site who insist on name calling. I find it immature and it only takes away from not adds anything to your argument. You may have noticed I attempt to use the persons office title or Mr. or Mrs. when ever possible. Call me old fashion but the exchange of ideas can be and should be civil.”

    http://www.uspresidentialelectionnews.com/2014/06/hillary-will-decide-by-end-of-year-on-presidential-run/#OD8Vj3ft6DbVDgTt.99

    That HIGH MOUNTAIN you place yourself ON TOP OF ((( JUST ))) HAD a major landslide crashing you down from your exhaled high throne.

    “Old fashion” ??? You bob ??? That a false allegation. Sue yourself

  • Bill Hedges

    TRYING to compete with ME ???:

    WHEN I USED Huffington you complained AS YOU DO NOW. However, when NATE used Huffington sometime afterwards, YOU CLAIMED UP.

    IS VERY SIMPLE. WHATEVER the source, disprove the material IF YOU CAN BECAUSE you disagree.

    Democrats are Americans in GOOD STANDING. Some ARE church goers, gun owners, even some against abortion. Not all gay. There ARE CONSERVATIVE as well as Tea Democrats.

    Your conclusion IS _ pet·u·lant _…

    Simple OUTRIGHT deny you complained of my using Huffington BUT THEN YOU TOOK THE FIFTH of silence when Nate used same source_____ I would GLADLY prove you WRONG BY finding it. As I do OFTEN. LEAVING egg on your face. Once you deny.

    Trying to jump to my level, you throw out J.D. remark. Well I deny it AS YOU EXPLAINED IT. So MAKE ME the LIAR bob. LOCATE THE EVIDENCE. Give the location as PROOF. Failure TO DO, SHOWS you’re full of _ H O T A I R _… Your REMARKS can not BE TRUSTED…

  • Bill Hedges

    _ Su·per·cil·i·ous _

    Under NO ILLUSIONS bob will prove his statement he assigns TO ME concerning J.D.. bob can not doctor achieves.

    1. Seeking justification, bob imagines the land of OZ:

    “When J.D. used the Washington Post or New York Times as a source on this site you were the first one to claim (not clam)it wasn’t acceptable because it was from a liberal site”

    Proof bob _ wait for Devil to need a WINTER COAT before bob proves.

    Would make HIS DAY, YEAR, LIFE, TO PROVE ME WRONG HERE. Not HOLDING my breath that bob will. HE CAN NOT. Instead bob will re-visit the SAME ROCK he crawls under to hide. Waiting for the furious fireballs to pass him by.

    2. WHEN I USED Huffington you complained AS YOU DO NOW. However, when NATE used Huffington sometime afterwards, YOU CLAMED UP.

    IS VERY SIMPLE. WHATEVER the source, disprove the material IF YOU CAN BECAUSE you disagree & CAN.

    Your only ability is to dismiss the link. Limited to MY USE ONLY, not by NATE’S PEN.

    Definition of hypocrisy. Logic IS nonsensical bob.

    Will GLADLY provide supporting evidence of my claim. UNLIKE bob. Just deny… I wish to shame YOU as my reward for spending the time to locate.

    3. I wrote:

    Democrats are Americans in GOOD STANDING. Some ARE church goers, gun owners, even some against abortion. Not all gay. There ARE CONSERVATIVE as well as Tea Democrats.

    Your conclusion IS _ pet·u·lant _…

    Point being a Democrat link DOES NOT eliminate the possibility of the THE TRUTH. What bob can not disprove, he dismisses by use of the link political leaning.

    To which bob replied:

    You’ve gone to the dark side Luke”

    To my RATIONAL statement, bob goes into outer space. Enunciates irrational gibber…

    Has been established Tea organization DID NOT SUPPORT Cantor’s opposition. Reason_ LITTLE CHANCE IN winning.

    Though Tea Groups are eager to HOP ON the winning bandwagon. Nate & bob point to “grassroots” for win. Financial support “Zero” by Tea Groups. Not much hope of “grassroots” miracle SEEN.

    Tea is a vine with FEW LEAVES to support photosynthesis thus LIFE. Tea NEEDS a shot in the arm, butt, and jugular for emergency life support. Nate sees clouds opening up to take a bit out of Speaker of House.

    In years ending in 4, Republican leaders fell:

    “Cantor’s defeat was the first primary setback for a senior leader in Congress in recent years. Former House Speaker Thomas Foley of Washington and Senate Democratic leader Tom Daschle of South Dakota both lost their seats at the polls in the past two decades, but they fell to Republicans, not to challengers from within their own parties”

    http://www.tribstar.com/news/x611392166/U-S-House-Majority-Leader-Eric-Cantor-defeated-in-primary-upset

    Thomas Foley loss 1994

    Tom Daschle loss 2004

    Consider this a _ pre·ten·tious _ coincidence. However Republican leaders FALL without push by Tea.

    Not so HERE:

    “7 reasons Eric Cantor lost”

    This IS of high principle Tea standards ???:

    “6. … and the left: Larry Sabato, diirector of the University of Virginia Center for Politics said Democrats, who make up 43% of the district, played a role as well.”

    “There was a major outreach to Democrats in that district,” Sabato said. “You had Brat operatives going to Democratic Party committees, even on election eve, asking them to go to the polls to get rid of Eric Cantor. It had nothing to do with Dave Brat. There were robocalls to Democrats in that district, wanting — telling Democrats come out to the polls.”

    http://www.cnn.com/2014/06/11/politics/why-eric-cantor-lost/

    ADVANTAGE to Democrats_ Much EASIER to defeat UNKNOWN than Eric Cantor.

    Nate & bob see a precursor to rebirth exuberance for Tea Party. “Grassroots”. That caused WIN… period… And I walked TO the moon and returned LAST NIGHT too…