The mask slips: ‘Counselor’ glorifies her abortion by filming it

We are so frequently told that abortion clinics do not push abortion as a first option but, rather, they present it as an option alongside adoption. Furthermore, we’re told how far out of their way these clinics go to push birth control and ways to prevent unwanted pregnancies before women are “forced” to choose abortion as a last resort. Those claims and assertions have always been dubious at best, and now it appears as though one worker at a clinic in New Jersey has let the mask slip away to reveal just how eager some of these pro-abortion advocates are to glorify the barbaric procedure.

As Fox News reports, video surfaced this week of an abortion clinic ‘counselor’ filming herself as she underwent the procedure to demonstrate how easy it was and painless it was, for her:

A New Jersey abortion clinic employee whose video of her own abortion has gone viral in recent days has drawn intense criticism from pro-life groups, who accuse her of glorifying the killing of an unborn child. [Emphasis added]

Emily Letts, 25, said when she became pregnant last fall after not using birth control, she quickly decided to have an abortion at the Cherry Hill Women’s Center in Cherry Hill, where she works as an abortion counselor. But as she prepared for the procedure, she believed sharing the experience online might help de-stigmatize abortion, with video the most powerful means available to her.

I would like to correct the story as it was written by Fox. The video was not depicting her abortion, since she has already had the pleasure of being born. Rather, the video was depicting the abortion of her unborn child, who was never given the pleasure of taking a breath of life outside his or her mother’s womb.

Another angle to this story I find remarkably revealing is how Emily Letts, as an ‘abortion counselor,’ was so cavalier in choosing to become pregnant and then so quick to immediately choose abortion and — more interesting yet — to document the ordeal on film. I am left asking if the entire pregnancy was a planned event so she would be able to make this video as a way to push her agenda forward.

If you’re an ‘abortion counselor’ and all day long you supposedly hand out condoms, explain forms of birth control, and look for ways to prevent abortion, how can you possibly have not followed your own advice to avoid an unwanted child? The situation does not compute in the world of logic and reason unless there is an underlying agenda and a preconceived plan to produce a video like this. So far, there is no concrete evidence to support that scenario of a premeditated event but the circumstantial case makes it possible in my book.

When asked about her decision to end the life of her unborn child, Letts was unremorseful and seemed to be beaming with pride:

“I don’t feel like a bad person. I don’t feel sad. I feel in awe of the fact that I can make a baby. I can make a life,” Letts says at the end of the video. “I knew what I was going to do was right, because it was right for me, and no one else.” [Emphasis added]

She’s in awe of the fact that she can make a baby only to immediately end it’s very short life without so much as a tear shed. I find it stunning that she even admits a life was created inside her womb and yet she’s totally fine with the fact she she ended it. Furthermore, she says it was right for her, and ‘no one else.’ Who is the ‘no one else’ she’s referring to? The baby? The baby’s father?

However, I digress from attacking Emily Letts’ decision to become pregnant and gleefully destroy the baby that was growing inside her. Truth be told, there are two destroyed lives here but the one still living just hasn’t come to grips with it yet. She is someone who needs prayer and counseling herself, but not from a place that would cheerfully bring a woman in to film the destruction of human life to push a political agenda.

  • COnservativegal

    Wow! I had never thought of it like that. This woman very easily could have made life with the full intentions of taking it away all for celebrity. What is frighting is that this woman is counciling other woman and pushing her own agenda like you’ve said.

    I always pause to think of the flip side, as an obvious “feminist” lib I almost can guarentee that Ms.Letts is a granola eating, PETA pushing, anti death penalty kinda gal. Ironic

  • Bill Hedges

    “Rand Paul: “Not Changing Any Laws on Abortion,” Life at Conception a “Personal” Belief”

    4/23/14

    “Rand Paul is a pro-life Senator from Kentucky who appears poised to become one of the candidates for the Republican nomination for president in 2016. Although he has a strong pro-life voting record, Paul is making comments about abortion that are concerning pro-lifers.”

    “The country is in the middle (and) we’re not changing any of the laws until the country is persuaded otherwise,” he says.”

    “Paul talked about how abortion laws can and shoulder reflect a middle ground position on abortion between life beginning at conception and abortion on demand.”

    http://www.lifenews.com/2014/04/23/rand-paul-not-changing-any-laws-on-abortion-life-at-conception-a-personal-belief/

    Rand, early on, is HOVERING high in polls because HE HAS his father’s infrastructure. After 3 _ un·suc·cess·ful _ attempts at WH by Ron, Rand is showing signs of being HIS OWN MAN. Seeking to SHAKE UP, bring in NEW VOTE BLOOD to PUSH him into the winner’s circle. Courting “Millennials” as I have commented on previously. In HIS pursuit, Immigration now abortion is THE BAIT ???

    DARING moves for Rand. Rubio is NO LONGER the darling of the Tea Party JUST over immigration. Rand adds NITRO (ABORTION)to his fuel in flight to WH.

    ONE logical possibility is split in votes between Rand & Ted neutering BOTH. A WASH with Tea. “Millennials” is second stage to success.

    Will Tea “principle” allow support for NEW & improved RAND ??? Merely CHANGING stance sickens SOME. Will Cruz OR another catch a ride to THE Yellow Brick Road as Rand’s STAR fades in bad judgment ???

  • Bob

    You have to ask yourself just how objective Ms. Letts is as a counselor if she has the cavalier attitude “I wanted to destigmatize abortion”? Would she mention adoption at all to patients she is counseling ? Would she mention the pro’s and con’s of the procedure both physical and emotionally? Did they show her scans of the child’s development in
    side her? I’ll bet money she didn’t get any counseling before her decision. It probably went along the same lines as the conception “Wham, Bam”.

    I refuse to log on to watch this brainless twits video but perhaps she wasn’t pregnant at all and this was all just one big Planned Parenthood propaganda video?

    In any case her response “It was right for me and no one else” speaks volumes about the people running the abortion industry and the morals of America today.

    • http://www.youdecidepolitics.com Nate

      Don’t watch the video, it destroys whatever is left of your respect for the human race.

      You mirror my thoughts. What kind of “counselor” is this heinous woman? Clearly not one who would advise a woman not to have an abortion since she herself is working so hard to make it seem so awesome.

      According to the propaganda, there are no emotional scars attached. It’s just a clump of cells, except this sicko admits it’s a living child she just snuffed out and she’s totally cool with that because it was right for her to do. Luckily, the child couldn’t object to her yet so she got it done quick before her child became demanding and wanted to leave the womb.

      Very sad, very sad indeed.

  • Bob

    We have become an amoral society obsessed with a public morality based on political correctness and a right and wrong beliefs based on relative opinion. A society where Michael Vick is ostracized FOR LIFE because he killed dogs and yet the abortion of a child can be thought of as a right. A society where the slippery slope can have a sports writer wonder on PBS what does the NBA commissioner Adam Silver do with the De Vos family who own the Orlando Magic? Their crime? No they didn’t make racist remarks. Their crime is BEING CHRISTIAN and funding anti-gay candidates and supporting anti-gay issues around the country.Our morality bends easily to outrage. It bends reluctantly to tradition and common sense.

    The article entitled: “NBA Slippery Sterling Slope Haters Target Christian Owner”

    http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-Sports/2014/05/01/Sterling-Slippery-Slope

  • Bill Hedges

    I don’t think Cruz has a CHANCE IN OZ of being Republican Primary choice. Though I LIKE the NEW & IMPROVED Paul, expect Tea to self mutilate themselves, PULLING a bob __ stay HOME vote DAY. Changing stance ON immigration reform ahhh amnesty, & abortion (as Nate writes_ “sicko admits it’s a living child”). Two STRONGLY HELD beliefs KICKED TEA TOTTERS to the ground on this site. Perhaps dumbfounding BUT OBVIOUSLY silencing. Very old saying, “cold enough to freeze the tail, nose, ears and whiskers off a brass monkey”

    http://www.grammar-monster.com/sayings_proverbs/freeze_balls_off_brass_monkey.htm#lDpSHUfa4uRwIvvu.99

    Giving THE WORSE, the presidencies, to second term buma. This be “principle”, stripe me of high standards. Moses, the imperfect mortal, lead the children of Israel. Nate dislikes “establish leader” candidate in KY, but Paul supports OVER the tea candidate.

    Their IS A REASON why tea did not conquer Republican Party AS bob PREDICTED, but heads towards limb chopper after falling of a dead tree.

    bob writes:

    “We have become an amoral society obsessed with a public morality based on political correctness and a right and wrong beliefs based on relative opinion.”

    WELL WAY back when:

    “The children now love luxury; they have bad manners, contempt for
    authority; they show disrespect for elders and love chatter in place
    of exercise. Children are now tyrants, not the servants of their
    households. They no longer rise when elders enter the room. They
    contradict their parents, chatter before company, gobble up dainties
    at the table, cross their legs, and tyrannize their teachers.”

    Attributed to SOCRATES by Plato

    http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview?id=408989

    Can read in Founding Father’s day of thoughts that some WANTED to be King, as we here today occasionally.

    bob’s “”We have become an amoral society obsessed…” IS NOTHING new UNDER THE SUN nor necessarily TRUE.

    By Tea’s actions, THEIR GOALS is dismantled. Compromise of a Newt LIKE IS left. NEEDED. THIS BE Rand ???

    Nate said Romney WASN’T his choice. Would Romney be MORE LIKELY than buma to appoint Supreme Court replacements that sided against abortion ??? Winner in WH has indirect repercussions. SC Judges appointed FOR LIFE…

  • Bill Hedges

    NOT Their IS A REASON, BUT There

    Not here today BUT hear…

  • Bill Hedges

    Once in awhile bob does wear his thinking cap. Can now LGHEN UP on pounding the “FACTS OF LIFE” into his shull:

    Bob May 9, 2014 at 11:00 pm

    “Pssst…….Perhaps you missed the news but Rand Paul is going “ESTABLISHMENT” on you with his change of heart on immigration reform, voter ID and abortion.”

    http://www.uspresidentialelectionnews.com/2014/05/indiana-gov-mike-pence-as-2016-dark-horse-for-the-gop/#6ZFeGeGaRPORBmQf.99

    A statement on the other site THAT WASN’T DISPROVEN was:

    Victoria DeLacy May 10, 2014 at 4:44 am

    “The only question is whether it should be Pence/Cruz or Cruz/Pence and I would prefer the latter from the simple standpoint that Ted is better known at this point nationwide (especially after the 21 hour stand taken against the socialized medicine bill opposed by fully 2/3 of the electorate and at least 83% of doctors to this day)”

    http://www.uspresidentialelectionnews.com/2014/05/indiana-gov-mike-pence-as-2016-dark-horse-for-the-gop/#6ZFeGeGaRPORBmQf.99

    True about dislike for bumcare, HOWEVER irrelevant concerning Cruz stand on Debt Ceiling and funding bumcare. Cruz stand was directly associated to DROP IN Tea popularity showed by Gallup polls.

    Taking chance, first time ever, of defaulting on USA loans was TOO RISKY. Cruz didn’t listen to SOLID ADVISE given by McCain.

    ANOTHER INDICATOR Cruz WAS NOT _ cat·a·pult·ed _ to top of Republican Presidential polls.

    In that discussion I echo what goethebehr wrote.

    IS _ fa·ce·tious _, though NOT IMPOSSIBLE, to believe a Tea Party candidate will win primary for Republican Party. There were 2 last time. Steady DROP of Tea popularity lowers THEIR LIGHT’s illumination…

  • Bill Hedges

    Correction:

    skull…

  • Bob

    This is nothing more than an ABORTION SELFIE seeking attention and affirmation of her peers like being friended on “FACEBOOK”.Her own little reality show while pushing her cause.