Encouraging Our Enemies

The President claimed yesterday that for the past three weeks Conservative efforts to get the health care and financial nightmare under control “encouraged our enemies!” Persistently devoid of class, the President maintains his particular brand of negative mojo.

A brief review of encouragement for our enemies.

Missile defense in Eastern Europe, pulled out from under the Czechs and the Poles based on constant whining from the Russians with the additional guarantee of ‘more flexibility’ with Russia in the future.

The Turks dropped a dime on an Israeli intelligence operation in Iran. The President and his administration had nothing to say. No price to pay on the part of the Turks. Message delivered.

Syria; all of it!

The Cairo speech was the political equivalent of reaching down to pick up a bar of soap in the prison shower room.

The Israeli Prime Minister was snubbed on his first visit to President Obama’s White House.

The Taliban was not left out, the President announcing the date we would leave the field open to those kind and gentle folk who kill young girls who wish to learn to read. The Taliban’s response; “you have a watch, we have time.”

No ongoing supportive presence in Iraq has contributed to horrific violence as Islamists attack the regime.

Benghazi and its connections to Jihadists and Morsi’s administration is a phony scandal; no arrests!

Aid to Egypt is downgraded when exactly the opposite should be happening. The Brotherhood is ecstatic!

Iran’s nuclear program proceeds apace with the President clearly doing everything possible to slow down the possibility of Israeli action by agreeing to talks he should know will go nowhere.

Saudi Arabia, absent the bow, cannot figure out what U.S. policy actually is.

Edward Snowden, resettled in Russia, no price to pay for Russian intransigence or Russian face slaps.

Continual smack downs at the U.N. by Russia and China.

Support for the Muslim Brotherhood at home and abroad. The Brotherhood being the font from which spewed the voice of extremist Islam.

No attempt to get our most significant global advantage, our economy, straightened out.

Allowing sequester cuts to the military when a universe of other options were available.

Leading from behind!

No one stood up and said to Defense Department lawyers; “to hell with it; pay the death benefits, they can sue me later.” William Shakespeare offered us some advice; “first kill all the lawyers.”

There is a distinct absence of outrage or even comment as Islamists the world over attempt to eliminate Christians and Jews alike. Some of the worst atrocities occurred under President Morsi’s time as President of Egypt. You know, the guy we supported.

  • Bill Hedges

    I DON’T LIKE THIS GUY. Nor his wife. So many reasons.

    Senator buma trying to get government $$$ for hospital where wife worked. At same time, wife gets high paying, VERY IMPORTANT, job position. Once she leaves, position is left vacant. They buy portion of vacant lot to their home, now the other lot is TOO SMALL to legally build a home. WHY would seller sell, would buyer pay so much, or just buy the entire empty lot ?

    Acquaintances such as Rev. Wright, Bill Ayers, & Louis Farrakhan. A bad feeling runs up my spine. Not talking about Spike Lee. The reason for the ROSE GARDEN booze party, refusal to have photo taken next to our newest fighter plan, not crossing his heart during pledge to the United States. HE sleep through YEARS of racist sermons by the godfather to his children, Rev. Wright ? NO clue ?

    These ARE A FEW of the minor reasons.

    There are a LOT OF bad feelings running up & down my spine with buma. Some provable, some pretty sure, and some very weak. I FIGHT the urge to BLAME ALL upon his shoulders. A real battle.

    BUT “Continual smack downs at the U.N. by Russia and China” ? What’s new in that ??? I’d emphasize more “No attempt to get our most significant global advantage, our economy, straightened out”. He said he would cut debt in 1/2 ? bumcare is off the table as far as he is concerned. Let bumcare reality bring the bumcare haters knotting at his door with battering rams and torches. Tar & feathers in tow. Minds can be altered. Tell the tale and WATCH as voters learns about their 2014 health insurance. Emptier bank account leads to misery with (Ds) like 2010.

    WW 1 when returning vets were denied their bonus pay, camping out next to Capital hill, a TO BE General Douglas MacArthur got his orders to break up. At least buma did not give SUCH A ORDER. About the best I can give him credit for.

    Our country was blessed with fossil energy. Something buma tossed in the trash. Priorities for recovery are all mixed up. EPA “GONE WILD”. Fastest, surest recovery is to STOP exporting $$$s buying OIL elsewhere. Create those jobs here at home using our own resources. Biggest importer is Canada & their source is shale oil. We have MORE THAN OUR FAIR SHARE of that.

    We are “Encouraging Our Enemies”. We have Condors flying over our exacerbate, near dead bodies.

    buma speaks of education. All well & good. That’s future promise of food on table. Change on ATTITUDE OF HOME MADE ENERGY through fossil fuel, is food on table next week. May take years to find & produce oil then reach the pump. JOBS created in that process. un-shelving coal doesn’t take years. Cut 10 year process to drill oil with all that red tape and treats of lawsuits.

    Be business friendly. Allow importing off-shore profits WITHOUT intolerable, excessive high taxes. Build factory here at home with 2nd highest tax structure for cooperation ? bumcare tax for employing here, EPA regulations, etc., what do these factors do for BOTTON LINE ? How likely, in deep debt, is America to further raise taxes ? America, under buma, is a cesspool fighting the American dream. EVERY SINGLE TAX CUT for rich INCREASED GOVERNMENT revenue. CBO refuses to acknowledge this in their ESTIMATES. FRANKLY in this atmosphere, CBO has good cause. Am not sure EVEN TAX CUTS FOR RICH would follow historic increase in revenue. buma has fumbled the football. Like his debt, like NONE OTHER…

    Stop the secrecy. Not talking benfits THEIR SIDE. Maybe our real debt is $70 trillion MORE or LESS. Tell the AMERICAN PEOPLE every chance we get. I don’t think WE MADE IT CLEAR why were against bumcare. Tell them why official $17 trillion debt is JUST FOR SHOW to HELP VOTERS sleep better. We geared up our nation for war in WW 2. THIS is our WW 3.

    A few of the reasons why I call him buma…

  • Bill Hedges

    Not knotting but knocking…

  • Bob

    I haven’t heard exactly to what remarks you are referring and wish you would have elaborated a bit more on the content of his remarks. It sounds however like he knows something more than what he is letting on to. Something is about to happen and he is playing C.Y.A.

  • Bob

    UNDER THE TITLE “ENCOURAGING OUR ENEMIES” I WOULD HAVE THOUGHT IT WAS CONCERNING THE ESTABLISHMENT republicans.

    “HE’S READY FOR YOU”

    http://www.conservativehq.com/sites/default/files/immigrationcartoonWeb.jpg

  • Bob

    The “Bunk House Lawyers” who read and put so much faith in the “Huffington Post” are at it again. An Andrew Reinbach of the fore mention publication suggest that the GOP leaders who led the shutdown are guilty of “SEDITION” which my dictionary is described as “an insurrection or resistance against the government”.Why stop there Joseph Stalin put his political enemies against a wall.

    I have a few questions for the tin foil hat gentleman and his Huffington Post followers however. First if your are going to cherry pick the Constitution to suit your agenda you should at least be truthful. Of the last 18 shutdowns of the government 15 were led by Democrats why not charge them also. When you use terms like “force to prevent, hinder or delay the execution of any law of the United States does that also cover President Obama with the “Defense of Marriage Act or him granting immunity to illegal immigrants from being arrested? Or when the President proclaims “If Congress won’t act I will” neglecting the separation of powers articles? And explain to us Mr.Reinbach about which branch of government controls the purse strings.But articles like this are simply mindless red meat aimed at the uninformed left who patronize this liberal rag like so much else it puts out. The sad part is the site gives the impetus to other bunk house lawyers who go around charging “fraud” etc.

    The article entitled: “The GOP Shutdown Is Sedition And Shouldn’t Be Forgiven”

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/andrew-reinbach/the-gop-shutdown-is-sedit_b_4079692.html

  • Bill Hedges

    “The “Bunk House Lawyers” who read and put so much faith in the “Huffington Post” are at it again.”

    YES. A few times I have used Huffington. You can SO EASILY DISPROVE __ you said __ but you didn’t.

    ” tin foil hat gentleman ” ? I call you bob. I call you “wacho bird” because you admitted to being one. I never said I was a “establishment Republican” or Rockefeller Republican. I am a TEA.
    __

    “I have a few questions for the tin foil hat gentleman and his Huffington Post followers however”

    That is not a accurate characterization of myself. A few times using Huffington does not make me what you said. You have used New York Time, should I/did I, label you with THAT.

    I WON’T ANSWER YOUR QUESTION for now. Respond to my comments in this article THEN I WILL.

    Label I have placed around your neck is you misquote me and take my quotes out of context. THAT I have proved…
    __

    STOP lying and saying you will not communicate with me. That you are leaving this site. That I stopped bones, etc. from using liberal links. You are talking to me on this site. I never stopped them from using liberal links but disproved them. I’m not going to start a blog.

    “Really !!!???!!!”…

  • Bill Hedges

    I pick the Huffington link I will use. Ones with FACTS I AGREE WITH. LIKE I said previously, some conservatives sites are far too emotional and beyond my comfort level. Conservative articles are not ALL TRUE with ALL liberal articles ALL FALSE. Every move buma takes IS NOT WRONG.

  • Bill Hedges

    ARE you acting bias or being racist ???

  • Bob

    HONEST I WAS ONLY JOKING IN MY 18th of October @ 11:43PM POST !

    http://tpc.pc2.netdna-cdn.com/peoples_resource/image/26525-m.jpg

    NOTE:THIS IS SATIRE AND A PHOTOSHOP AND DOES NOT REQUIRE LINKS OR PROOF OF ANY KIND!

  • Bill Hedges

    I pick the Huffington link I will use. Ones with FACTS I AGREE WITH. LIKE I said previously, some conservatives sites are far too emotional and beyond my comfort level. Conservative articles are not ALL TRUE with ALL liberal articles ALL FALSE. Every move buma takes IS NOT WRONG

    ARE you acting bias or being racist ???

    In school, I was taught all the great religions, about old Russia, etc.. Because I was exposed to these things was I more likely to be other than Christian or become a communist ? Hitler & Satan were salvage people, but German & Russian people are as diverse as we are.

    Point being Huffington articles are good, bad, and some times indifferent. At times radical AS SOME extreme leaning right wing links. I am not a WET rag absorbing all I read as gospel. I am able to cut out the bad and process the rest as is appropriate. For same reason I sent my children to school, I want them to have a rounded education. Not TO BELIEVE all they are told. ABLE TO discern the truth as it relates to them. Even expand their own personal world.

    You claim to be educated. Most such people have a relatively diverse one. You CLAIM to be able to disprove anything in Huffington AT WILL. Never seen you do with article I use.

    Irrational hatred is good explanation of __ acting bias or being racist __. They are not exclusive to race relations necessarily. You have a HARD ON towards anything related to Huffington. Thus the question.

    In YOUR MIND’S EYE, ARE you acting bias or being racist ??? you reply:

    “HONEST I WAS ONLY JOKING IN MY 18th of October @ 11:43PM POST !”

    SURE. And children’s entertainer MR RODGES was not a killer in WAR & did not wear a sweater AT ALL TIMES on tv to cover his tattoos. Not relevant. He wasn’t.

    MAYBE bob’s psychotic episodes leading him too SO OFTEN quoting me WRONG so often OUT OF CONTEXT. THIS no “JOKE”
    __

    bob wrote:

    “HONEST I WAS ONLY JOKING IN MY 18th of October @ 11:43PM POST !”

    TAKE BOB SERIOUSLY ??? “REALLY !!!???!!!”. When fish fly from “sea to shining sea”. Seriously. He WAS. I made a fool of him. Showed how far up his anus he extended his foot…

  • Bob

    “Hitler and Satan were SALVAGE people”….sort of like “Sanford and Son”?

    Pssst…….it’s Joseph Stalin….not Satan we’re discussing!

  • Bob

    “Lets put this in it’s proper context”

    Since President Obama took office Conservatives took control of more governor offices and state legislations than any time in history. There are now 30 center-right governors. In addition Conservatives now control 27 center-right state legislations entirely and split power in 5 others states.”

    “Because of that power 27 states a majority rejected Obamacare health care exchanges. An even bigger story than that is that for the first time in history a majority of states have turned down “free” federal money.Specifically 26 states have thus far opted not to expand Medicaid to 138% of the federal poverty rate in exchange for federal funding at 100% for first 3 years and 90% thereafter. This reduction of federal money means those 26 states will save Americans more than $539 billion in federal deficit spending over the next 10 years.The fight in the states isn’t over as several states still remain in play.”

    From the article entitled: “Conservatives Are Winning Just not In Washington”

    http://www.redstate.com/jasonahart/2013/10/18/conservatives-are-winning-just-not-in-washington/

  • Bill Hedges

    1. I made no typo. Didn’t misspell. Meant to write Satan. Study up on what he did in Russia & you might understand WHY.

    You have a demeaning term for John Mc. I use buma for guess who. EVEN YOU knew WHO I was talking about when I said Satin. If I called someone Misquoter or out of contexter WHO WOULD I BE TALKING ABOUT ??? After all, YOU KNOW about NAME-CALLING_ ” tin foil hat gentleman ”

    Keep trying. You look SO FOOLISH TRYING TO SHOW ME AS MAKING MISTAKES. With THAT RING on my finger, is easy as sliding on ice showing YOU wrong.

    2. Did “Sanford and Son” kill people ?

    3. Anything to ignore the _ pre·dic·a·ment _ I put your through in my comments.

    4. Yes SALVAGE was mistake. Shall I BEGIN POINTING OUT YOUR MISPELLED WORDS ??? I can point out a recent misspelled word by author. NOT POINTED OUT because it is insignificant. Like writing SALVAGE instead of savage. ONE EXTRA LETTER. That is a honest mistake. This is NOT:

    Tora, Tora, Tora Bill Hedges Jun 2nd, 2013 at 5:17 pm”
    1.
    “SOME DEEP THINKING” by bob ? N E V E R. INABILITY…
    ______ HELP POLICE !!! ______________ Arrest bob for literature fraud _____ Call 911 _______________
    Fraud
    “A false representation of a matter of fact—whether by words or by conduct, by false or misleading allegations, or by concealment of what should have been disclosed—that deceives and is intended to deceive another so that the individual will act upon it to her or his legal injury.”
    “Fraud is commonly understood as dishonesty calculated for advantage. A person who is dishonest may be called a fraud. In the U.S. legal system, fraud is a specific offense with certain features”
    http://legal-dictionary.t……com/fraud
    SUCH *** an·i·mos·i·ty *** shown. *** in·tim·i·da·tion *** doesn’t work OVER HERE. There is no *** am·bi·gu·i·ty ***. bob owes a apology for:
    A. bob partial quotes me. Leaving out the most pertinent part of my quote:
    “I watch a lot of movies.Have ban most politics from my cable.”
    I wrote:
    I watch a lot of movies. Have ban most politics from my cable. I research online.
    B. bob leaves off KEY PART OF MY QUOTE, then says:
    “I was taught that if you didn’t know what you were talking about as is clearly evident here YOU KEEP YOUR MOUTH SHUT AND NOT EMBARRASS YOURSELF!”
    bob neither *** a·pol·o·gies *** nor shows any sign of remorse. SHAMEFUL…
    __

    You talk of “ONLY JOKING” & this. Anything to not speak more on your SHORT-COMINGS.

  • Bill Hedges

    I have already written a comment similar to:

    “Bob UNITED STATES Oct 19th, 2013 at 8:03 pm”

    Maybe you read it.

    We did WELL in recall attempt in WI.` What I have not noticed being mentioned here IS THIS:

    “Colorado voters deal blow to gun control with stunning recall of 2 Democrats”

    http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/sep/10/colorado-gun-rights-backers-gun-control-activists-/?page=all

    In “Bob UNITED STATES Oct 19th, 2013 at 7:14 pm” bob’s foot went further into unchartered water…

  • Bill Hedges

    To be petty LIKE BOB, I should point out???:

    No (“) in front of “Since” in his last comment. bob has made similar mistakes before BUT I made no comment. WAS of insignificant importance…

  • Bill Hedges

    bob will stand behind his words AS FAST as he can back peddle from his unthinking personal attacks against myself as well as “republicans”. PROVE is a dirty 5 letter word TO HIM…

    Bill Hedges

  • Bob

    An interesting article where Senator Cruz unlike his establishment republican opponents refuses to get caught up in the MSM hype. As he stated what is said behind closed doors and what is fed to the media are two different things. The disagreement between statist Democrats and establishment republicans is about the degree of government intrusion NOT THE PRINCIPLE OF ALLOWING GOVERNMENT INTRUSION. Todays republican establishment is the George W. Bush “We have a responsibility that when someone hurts government has got to move.”

    I’m getting more and more impressed with the Senator from Texas!

    The article entitled; “Cruz: I Don’t work For Party Bosses”

    http://www.politico.com/blogs/politico-live/2013/10/cruz-i-dont-work-for-party-bosses-175494.html?hp=l2

  • Bob

    Well that about seals Senator Rubio’s fate as far as ANY SUPPORT FROM THE TEA PARTY IN 2016.FIRST HE GIVES HIS WHOLE HEARTED SUPPORT TO THE “GANG OF EIGHT” on immigration now he supports “Kentucky Kickback” McConnell against a Tea Party candidate.

    The article entitled:” Rubio Backs McConnell”

    http://www.politico.com/blogs/politico-live/2013/10/rubio-backs-mcconnell-175489.html?hp=r1

  • Bob

    “What we need to do is move forward with immigration reform…….” Senator John McCain (Rino-AZ)

    Perhaps we should remind the good Senator that HE WAS ALL FOR BUILDING A WALL TO KEEP ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS OUT WHEN HE WAS RUNNING FOR RE-ELECTION. Six Year Conservatives like Senators Hatch, McConnell and the good Senator from Arizona only get the Conservative principles when election time rolls around it seems………..AUTOPSIES ARE FOR ENTITIES THAT ARE DEAD

    Quote from the article entitled: “McCain: GOP Will Move Forward”

    http://www.politico.com/blogs/politico-live/2013/10/mccain-gop-will-move-forward-175490.html?hp=r3

  • Bob

    SENATOR MC CAIN WAS FOR THE KEEPING ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS OUT BEFORE HE WAS AGAINST IT! BUT RE-ELECTION WILL DO THAT TO ESTABLISHMENT republicans.

    Video entitled “COMPLETE THAT DANGED FENCE”

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r0lwusMxiHc

  • Bill Hedges

    So bob has his hand on the pulse of TEA. bob speaks for TEA:

    “Well that about seals Senator Rubio’s fate as far as ANY SUPPORT FROM THE TEA PARTY IN 2016”

    At least bob left a little room COULD HAPPEN STILL:

    “that about seals ”

    See NO REASON to go into bob’s 2 reasons. bob only listed the two reasons WITHOUT EXPLANATION.

    “McConnell against a Tea Party candidate.” AND ???

  • Bob

    “Hard line Conservatives aren’t just sticking it to the national GOP by shutting down the government and bringing the nation to the brink of default-they’re also refusing to pony up to help their party defend the House in 2014.”

    From the article entitled : “House Tea Partiers Snub GOP in 2014”

    http://www.politico.com/story/2013/10/tea-party-house-members-snub-gop-in-2014-98568.html?hp=t1

  • Bob

    SENATOR MCCAIN WAS FOR KEEPING ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS OUT BEFORE HE WAS FOR IMMGRATION REFORM ! BUT RE-ELECTION WILL DO THAT TO ESTABLISHMENT republicans.

    Video entitled: “COMPLETE THAT DANGED FENCE”

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r0lwusMxiHc

  • Bill Hedges

    “Bob UNITED STATES Oct 20th, 2013 at 11:03 am”

    “Bob UNITED STATES Oct 20th, 2013 at 4:56 pm”

    Same thing ONLY TWICE ???. SAY 5 times. Have no interest in wasting my time responding to. Need to clip my nails…
    __

    “Bob UNITED STATES Oct 20th, 2013 at 11:03 am” is SO EMPTY of facts WHY WOULD I REPLY ???

    http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://media.cagle.com/16/2013/03/21/129057_600.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.cagle.com/tag/cruz/page/7/&h=397&w=600&sz=91&tbnid=fhuUljfaamC2NM:&tbnh=90&tbnw=136&zoom=1&usg=__jvFGPMwcAeotfjV7cr7f8_GwJi0=&docid=b5rvdaDRGVc4aM&sa=X&ei=fVVkUqeDJYqq2wXn24CQDw&ved=0CDUQ9QEwAQ

  • Bob

    “BACKING FOR CRUZ FROM CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICANS IS AT 74% – A 27% JUMP FROM JULY ACCORDING TO A RECENT PEW POLL.”

    From an article entitled: ” U.S. Shutdown Leader Ted Cruz A Conservative Rock Star”

    http://news.yahoo.com/us-shutdown-leader-ted-cruz-conservative-rock-star-153601808.html

  • Bob

    Hmmmm seems I’ve made this same comparison on more than one occasion on this site.This article goes into a bit more detail on the impact of these ill thought through legislations however.

    Article entitled:”Obamacare Could Go Way Of Prohibition”

    http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2013/10/20/obamacare_could_go_way_of_prohibition_120395.html

  • Bill Hedges

    I don’t CHERRY PICK my poll I use. Rarely do I leave Gallup:

    “Sen. Ted Cruz, a leader of the conservative movement to defund Obamacare at any cost, has seen his favorability rating plummet in the last four months, according to a Gallup poll.

    http://www.newsmax.com/Politics/gallup-cruz-ratings-drop/2013/10/11/id/530650#ixzz2iIwI4QYm
    ___

    What was PEW MEASURING ???:

    “Cruz also took a hit in the polls. A Gallup poll released on October 10 found he had gained significant name recognition, but the percentage of Americans with an unfavorable view of him has jumped to 36 percent from 18 percent in June”

    http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/10/20/us-usa-politics-cruz-idUSBRE99J00V20131020

    CRUZ POPULAR with TEA while Tea popularity numbers DROPS:

    “October 16, 2013″

    Tea Party’s Image Turns More Negative. Ted Cruz’s Popularity Soars among Tea Party Republicans”

    http://www.people-press.org/2013/10/16/tea-partys-image-turns-more-negative/
    __

    Ok, Cruz is “sweetheart” for TEA Which is in FAILING HEALTH. Senator Rubio SUPPORTS “McConnell against a Tea Party candidate”.

    “SUN SHINES bright on the ole Kentucky Home”…

  • Bob

    Perhaps clipping your nails is all you are capable of. If you read the two post my post states Senator Cruz backing from CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICANS JUMPED 27% SINCE JULY TO 74%.

    Meanwhile your poll state that a PERCENTAGE OF AMERICANS WITH AN UNFAVORABLE VIEW OF HIM HAS JUMPED TO 36%.

    YOUR POLL ARE “ALL AMERICANS” WHICH BASED ON THE WAY THE QUESTION IS ASKED STILL GIVES A BROAD AUDIENCE TO INTERPRET ANY RESULTS.

    THE TEA PARTY IN FAILING HEALTH? LMAO…..PERHAPS YOU SHOULD READ THE OTHER LINKS I INCLUDED ON THIS THREAD.IN NOVEMBER 2014 AND 2016 YOU WILL BE CHEWING YOUR NAILS ! THE republican party won’t win without the tea party.

  • Bob

    “Asked about his former Vice Presidential running mate Sarah Palin suggesting primary challenges against fellow republicans such as Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (r-KY)and Senator Lindsey Graham (r-SC)McCain said “I just wish it would be respectful. I respect Ted Cruz. I respect these people and their views.”
    From article: McCain: GOP Will Move Forward
    see my post above for link…. 20th October @10:59 AM

    The Senators hypocrisy and outright lying is amazing !

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2013/03/08/mccain-calls-paul-cruz-amash-wacko-birds/

  • Bill Hedges

    bob doesn’t like the numbers so he write. Not with FACTS but with HIS PERSONAL self-serving OPINION.:

    “YOUR POLL ARE “ALL AMERICANS” WHICH BASED ON THE WAY THE QUESTION IS ASKED STILL GIVES A BROAD AUDIENCE TO INTERPRET ANY RESULTS”

    Tea in decline & Cruz is “sweetheart” for Tea. bob runs from the truth SUCH AS THIS &:

    Tora, Tora, Tora Bill Hedges Jun 2nd, 2013 at 5:17 pm”
    1.
    “SOME DEEP THINKING” by bob ? N E V E R. INABILITY…
    ______ HELP POLICE !!! ______________ Arrest bob for literature fraud _____ Call 911 _______________
    Fraud
    “A false representation of a matter of fact—whether by words or by conduct, by false or misleading allegations, or by concealment of what should have been disclosed—that deceives and is intended to deceive another so that the individual will act upon it to her or his legal injury.”
    “Fraud is commonly understood as dishonesty calculated for advantage. A person who is dishonest may be called a fraud. In the U.S. legal system, fraud is a specific offense with certain features”
    http://legal-dictionary.t……com/fraud
    SUCH *** an·i·mos·i·ty *** shown. *** in·tim·i·da·tion *** doesn’t work OVER HERE. There is no *** am·bi·gu·i·ty ***. bob owes a apology for:
    A. bob partial quotes me. Leaving out the most pertinent part of my quote:
    “I watch a lot of movies.Have ban most politics from my cable.”
    I wrote:
    I watch a lot of movies. Have ban most politics from my cable. I research online.
    B. bob leaves off KEY PART OF MY QUOTE, then says:
    “I was taught that if you didn’t know what you were talking about as is clearly evident here YOU KEEP YOUR MOUTH SHUT AND NOT EMBARRASS YOURSELF!”
    bob neither *** a·pol·o·gies *** nor shows any sign of remorse. SHAMEFUL…
    __

    Was THAT a Gallup poll bob used previously. bob couldn’t tell his poll was measuring something different THAN MINE.

    BOB YOU can not play with THE BIG BOYS. Stay away from POLLS. “YOU know NOT what you speak”…

  • Bill Hedges

    bob wants to DROP KICK polls far, far, away entering into “Bob UNITED STATES Oct 20th, 2013 at 7:55 pm” new territory of today’s discussion. bob chose to change subject from end of yesterday.

    Not even close to working. Free cigar NOT IN THE OFFERING. Republican numbers are down more than (D). Tea down more than Republicans. Cruz numbers doing well with cliff jumping Tea.

    What is your NEXT TRICK to ATTEMPT to save face ???

  • Bill Hedges

    You would THINK bob would BE proving HOW BAD Republicans are:

    “ON TO IMMIGRATION REFORM WHERE republicans CAN BE BOUGHT FOR A PRICE!”.

    Show PROOF bob. Don’t WHIMP OUT. You ALL TALK ???

  • Bob

    LMAO……Not the dog chasing his tail stratagem again?

    Good Night William !

  • Bill Hedges

    YES, “the dog chasing his tail stratagem again”

    ASKING BOB TO PROVE WHAT he says LIKE “ON TO IMMIGRATION REFORM WHERE republicans CAN BE BOUGHT FOR A PRICE”. That puts bob in back peddling gear backing away as fast as possible. Answer NOT.
    __

    Was THAT a Gallup poll bob used previously. bob couldn’t tell his poll was measuring something different THAN MINE.

    BOB YOU can not play with THE BIG BOYS. Stay away from POLLS. “YOU know NOT what you speak”…
    __

    Totally off limits is bob misquoting me to make fun of me. Add OUT OF CONTEXT too. BOB GOES blind seeing THAT
    __

    That is bob’s “dog chasing his tail stratagem again”. IS As HONEST as bob saying he will not converse with me. Some hours is as long as THAT LAST.

    This STUFF doesn’t disappear bob. What you say has consequences that doesn’t SET IN THE SUNSET. LIKE MAGIC your boo-boos reappear. Just because a day passes, it doesn’t go away…

  • Bill Hedges

    Be responsibly for what you say, most diffidently you will be asked to prove most times.

    There’s your “the dog chasing his tail stratagem again” excuse…

  • Bill Hedges

    diffidently _ was word I wished to use…

  • Bob

    Yogi:

    LMAO……You used the same word “diffidently” in both post including what you meant to be a correction. AND THEY ARE BOTH WRONG! THIS WORD MEANS LACKING CONFIDENCE

    I believe you meant to use “definitely” which means having distinct limits.(there’s your proof)

    No need to thank me !

  • Bill Hedges

    You have a mental ailment ???

    1. “Yogi”

    Used by misquoting ME. You misquote A LOT. No longer conceivably considered a accident, but obviously intentional OR ELSE mental ailment. Which IS IT ? Have another OPTION. Do elaborate.

    2. “You used the same word “diffidently” in both post including what you meant to be a correction. AND THEY ARE BOTH WRONG! THIS WORD MEANS LACKING CONFIDENCE”

    Now again, you can read MY MIND. Second time use of “diffidently” WAS NOT “meant to be a correction”. What I said was:

    diffidently _ was word I wished to use…

    Reading IS fundamentally. Gain some comprehension skills.

    I meant what I said. I said because I expected you of misconjecture.

    http://www.thefreedictionary.com/Misconjecture

    Need I supple link to BIG BOY WORDS I use for your consideration & clarity ???

    1. Earlier yesterday I gave a poll as you did. THE TWO measured two different THINGS. Was necessary for me to inform you OF THAT TRUTH. STAY AWAY FROM POLLS. YOU “KNOW NOT WHAT YOU SPEAK”.

    2. Stay away from quoting me. You have LONG RECORD of quoting incorrectly &/or OUT OF CONTEXT.

    Prime example:

    Tora, Tora, Tora Bill Hedges Jun 2nd, 2013 at 5:17 pm”
    1.
    “SOME DEEP THINKING” by bob ? N E V E R. INABILITY…
    ______ HELP POLICE !!! ______________ Arrest bob for literature fraud _____ Call 911 _______________
    Fraud
    “A false representation of a matter of fact—whether by words or by conduct, by false or misleading allegations, or by concealment of what should have been disclosed—that deceives and is intended to deceive another so that the individual will act upon it to her or his legal injury.”
    “Fraud is commonly understood as dishonesty calculated for advantage. A person who is dishonest may be called a fraud. In the U.S. legal system, fraud is a specific offense with certain features”
    http://legal-dictionary.t……com/fraud
    SUCH *** an·i·mos·i·ty *** shown. *** in·tim·i·da·tion *** doesn’t work OVER HERE. There is no *** am·bi·gu·i·ty ***. bob owes a apology for:
    A. bob partial quotes me. Leaving out the most pertinent part of my quote:
    “I watch a lot of movies.Have ban most politics from my cable.”
    I wrote:
    I watch a lot of movies. Have ban most politics from my cable. I research online.
    B. bob leaves off KEY PART OF MY QUOTE, then says:
    “I was taught that if you didn’t know what you were talking about as is clearly evident here YOU KEEP YOUR MOUTH SHUT AND NOT EMBARRASS YOURSELF!”
    bob neither *** a·pol·o·gies *** nor shows any sign of remorse. SHAMEFUL…

    3. YOU have no ability to READ MY MIND. LACKING CONFIDENCE is a possible answer FOR YOUR BEHAVIOR. You must MAKE UP THINGS concerning me to try and make me look BAD. More likely trying to build your self-esteem through attempt at destroying me.

    Seek professional council. Maybe link on HOW TO “COPY & PASTE” COULD assist you ???

  • Bill Hedges

    fundamentally needs last two letters removed.

  • Bob

    I wrote on 20th of October @ 4:51PM that the Tea Party members of Congress refuse to pony up in support of the GOP 2014 elections.(see post for link) Well now the reasons come out behind this. Speaker Boehner can’t pull strings if he hasn’t tied them.According to “opensecrets.org” there’s been almost no money going to the 20 Tea Party dissidents from leadership PAC’s and most were elected without any help from the NRCC.In other words they don’t owe the party leadership much.

    The opensecrets article entitled: “Dissidents Haven’t Seen The $ Love from Boehner, Cantor”

    http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2013/10/dissidents-havent-seen-the-love-from-boehner-cantor.html

  • Bill Hedges

    “the dog chasing his tail stratagem again?”

    IS bob’s security blanket. Brings bob into his secret, safe, WORLD. REALITY OF truth cast aside IN YOUR conscience but STILL ROOTED in your unconscious.

  • Bob

    Yogi:
    It doesn’t make a bit of sense but at least you have all the correct words!

  • Bill Hedges

    RUN diffidently bob Run. Run as FAST AS YOU CAN from “Bill Hedges Oct 21st, 2013 at 4:09 pm”

    Your sins are apparent…

  • Bill Hedges

    Theme flowing through bob’s remarks is DISHONESTY. IS THIS A trait of “wacho birds” OR just bob is still to be determined. bob tries to appear as being a clairvoyant saying I didn’t mean to use A CERTAIN WORD. bob had ANOTHER WORD more to bob’s liking “definitely”. Mockingly, I hope bob gives approval to my use of the word __ clairvoyant __:

    http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/clairvoyant
    __

    “Ah Yes, As Predicted 2013/10/01 at 4:04 pm”

    More OUT OF CONTEXT bob:

    “You should read my comments prior to entering this site.”
    Bill Hedges

    What I said was:

    You should read my comments prior to you entering this site. My knowledge of history goes well past Newt. Didn’t know you scanned my brain to determine my knowledge of conservatism past Newt. REMARKABLE…
    __

    Thought you gave me a:

    “GOOD NIGHT”

    BOB WROTE:

    “Why do I feel like I’m having a conversation with Yogi Berra?”

    BECAUSE you can not read in context. How many times MUST I PROVE ????

    “Ah Yes, As Predicted Bob 2013/10/01 at 3:52 pm”

    “You should always go to other peoples funerals or else they won’t come to yours.”……..Yogi Berra

    “You should read my comments prior to entering this site.”
    Bill Hedges

    “Why do I feel like I’m having a conversation with Yogi Berra?”
    __

    Give bob his due. Consistent dishonesty through MISQUOTES and/or OUT OF CONTEXT…

  • Bob

    LMAO…….Love it! Thanks for doing the research on that Yogi and proving my case.

  • Bill Hedges

    Proving you CORRECT ???

    SURELY TRUE, _diffidently_ does RELATE to you. Misquoting & out of context ARE NOT your only ailments in area of lack of self importance/esteem. Thus less TRUTHFULNESS. THOUGH TERM _ailments_ may be too weak for your symptoms. Is still in the dishonesty family, but called hallucination becoming more of a clinical trouble:

    http://www.thefreedictionary.com/hallucination

    Is this, in your case, drug induced or naturally occurring ???

  • Bob

    MY,MY,MY……Yogi’s not only a “Bunk House Lawyer” but a practicing “Web Site Psychiatrist”. A legend in his own mind!

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychiatrist

    Would that make your title Doctor Yogi Esq.

  • Bill Hedges

    Naturally occurring …

  • Bill Hedges

    Doctor Yogi Esq ???

    I don’t speak of my line of work online. Those who do so I general don’t believe. As I said:

    Theme flowing through bob’s remarks is DISHONESTY. IS THIS A trait of “wacho birds” OR just bob is still to be determined. bob tries to appear as being a clairvoyant saying I didn’t mean to use A CERTAIN WORD. bob had ANOTHER WORD more to bob’s liking “definitely”. Mockingly, I hope bob gives approval to my use of the word __ clairvoyant __:

    http://www.merriam-webste…..lairvoyant
    __

    “Ah Yes, As Predicted 2013/10/01 at 4:04 pm”

    More OUT OF CONTEXT bob:

    “You should read my comments prior to entering this site.”
    Bill Hedges

    What I said was:

    You should read my comments prior to you entering this site. My knowledge of history goes well past Newt. Didn’t know you scanned my brain to determine my knowledge of conservatism past Newt. REMARKABLE…
    __

    Thought you gave me a:

    “GOOD NIGHT”

    BOB WROTE:

    “Why do I feel like I’m having a conversation with Yogi Berra?”

    BECAUSE you can not read in context. How many times MUST I PROVE ????

    “Ah Yes, As Predicted Bob 2013/10/01 at 3:52 pm”

    “You should always go to other peoples funerals or else they won’t come to yours.”……..Yogi Berra

    “You should read my comments prior to entering this site.”
    Bill Hedges

    “Why do I feel like I’m having a conversation with Yogi Berra?”
    __

    Give bob his due. Consistent dishonesty through MISQUOTES and/or OUT OF CONTEXT…

  • Bob

    Perhaps we can get the University of Alabama to replace the republican party in 2016 seeing that they have more success in having people get fired.

    http://assets.patriotpost.us/images/2013-10-21-456be218.png

  • Bill Hedges

    Sadly THIS IS NOT a cartoon BUT IS bob:

    Give bob his due. Consistent dishonesty through MISQUOTES and/or OUT OF CONTEXT…

    Name calling, first to talk dirty with list made before fire returned, & consistent dishonesty through MISQUOTES and/or OUT OF CONTEXT. THAT’S A PROVEN.

    bob DOESN’T like “republicans”. bob’s political idols WILL RULE the nest he announces. Those, who agreed with polls & ended the shut down, bob name names and is AGAINST. REPUBLICAN numbers ARE GROWING, NOT “WACHO BIRDS” numbers.

    bob proclaims HIS GROUP won’t re-elect THESE Turncoats. WELL, they gained VOTES by doing as Gallup polls suggest (Naturally now polls are UNRELIABLE, etc..). bob’s group going to elect a worse choice ? MAYBE BOB WOULD. bob behavior is psychotic:

    http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/psychotic

    Notice hard evidence has been provided TO SUPPORT my diagnosis. Such as:

    Tora, Tora, Tora Bill Hedges Jun 2nd, 2013 at 5:17 pm”
    1.
    “SOME DEEP THINKING” by bob ? N E V E R. INABILITY…
    ______ HELP POLICE !!! ______________ Arrest bob for literature fraud _____ Call 911 _______________
    Fraud
    “A false representation of a matter of fact—whether by words or by conduct, by false or misleading allegations, or by concealment of what should have been disclosed—that deceives and is intended to deceive another so that the individual will act upon it to her or his legal injury.”
    “Fraud is commonly understood as dishonesty calculated for advantage. A person who is dishonest may be called a fraud. In the U.S. legal system, fraud is a specific offense with certain features”
    http://legal-dictionary.t……com/fraud
    SUCH *** an·i·mos·i·ty *** shown. *** in·tim·i·da·tion *** doesn’t work OVER HERE. There is no *** am·bi·gu·i·ty ***. bob owes a apology for:
    A. bob partial quotes me. Leaving out the most pertinent part of my quote:
    “I watch a lot of movies.Have ban most politics from my cable.”
    I wrote:
    I watch a lot of movies. Have ban most politics from my cable. I research online.
    B. bob leaves off KEY PART OF MY QUOTE, then says:
    “I was taught that if you didn’t know what you were talking about as is clearly evident here YOU KEEP YOUR MOUTH SHUT AND NOT EMBARRASS YOURSELF!”
    bob neither *** a·pol·o·gies *** nor shows any sign of remorse. SHAMEFUL…

  • Bob

    According to Democrat Dick Durbin a GOP leader said to the President during the shutdown negotiations “I can not even stand to look at you.” Mr.Durbin won’t say who this GOP leader was, Speaker Boehner ‘s office doesn’t remember it happening and the White House has no comment on it.Now this is all very similar to the Tea Party protest on Capital Hill 20th of March 2010(which I attended)where supposedly someone shouted racial slurs at African-American Democrats.Journalist Andrew Breitbart offered $100,000 reward to anyone who could provide a tape to prove this accusation. No one came forward!

    The point here is the Democrats make accusations which have no basis knowing full well the press will run with the story. You can bet your next pay check Chris Matthews and the rest of MSNBC will have Mr.Durbins quote as a highlight for the next 6 months. The longer they run with it and the more Liberal MSM that uses it the more it will be accepted as fact.Having “Politico” go with a story with so little proof is a bit surprising however.

    The article entitled: “Dick Durbin: GOP Leader Told President Obama “I Can Not Even Stand To Look At You”

    http://www.politico.com/story/2013/10/dick-durbin-repubican-leader-obama-98720.html?hp=f3

  • Bill Hedges

    As I agree & do, I place “Politico” & “Huffington” on the SAME PLAYING FIELD. Neither OWN the TRUTH. Closest OWNERS are American Thinker & Heritage Foundation. I find FALSEHOOD in a article THAT ARTICLE IS worthless from beginning to end. Tainted:

    “Remember ‘deficits don’t matter’? Cheney doesn’t”

    Now look at the spending numbers. What’s missing ? Let me THUNK !!! RISE IN INCOME !!! Revenue !!! Why ? Article is:

    BIAS

    ___ EVERY SINGLE TAX CUT FOR RICH ___ increased government revenue. But who is right & WHO IS wrong ? Easy. Article uses CBO “projections”. I use REAL RESULTS.

    http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/political-animal/2011_09/remember_deficits_dont_matter032197.php

    QUESTION_ This article was written September 14, 2011, why did author use “projections”, real numbers were AVAIBLE. ANSWER is BUSH TAX CUTS increased government revenue. A NO-NO concept IN (D) thinking:

    “Lying About Bush’s Tax Cuts”

    March 5, 2010

    “According to the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO), the Bush tax cuts actually shifted the total tax burden farther toward the rich so that in 2000-2004, total income tax paid by the top 40% of income-earners grew by 4.6% to 99.1% of the total.”

    http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/03/lying_about_bushs_tax_cuts.html

    There is NO contradiction.

    My earlier dated article uses REAL NUMBRS and PROVES Bush tax cuts increased revenue. While later date article uses “estimates”__ THUS lies. A theme I found existed when I commented on liberal blog.

    INCREASE in revenue IS IGNORED. Interferers with liberals STORY THEY lying PUSH on poor saps not reading CAREFULLY.
    __

    EVER HEAR Cheney say “debt doesn’t matter” ? You won’t find video of him saying that. Will find it on CNN as gospel truth. A FIRED guy said IT. Afterwards ran the circuit on tv selling his book.
    __

    bob writes:

    “The point here is the Democrats make accusations which have no basis knowing full well the press will run with the story”

    bob is just as dishonest. Clean your own house. Get it in order. Check my comment prior to your last comment…

  • Bill Hedges

    CBO will always consider tax cuts as loss of revenue…

  • Bob

    I find it odd that Democratic Rep. Alan Grayson sent out a fund raising letter recently which uses a burning cross as the “T” in Tea Party (see link below). Pair this with Senator Durbin’s out right lie concerning what a republican leader said to the President (see above post with link)and you have to ask yourself just who does the left intend it’s self serving self righteousness to be aimed at and to what purpose?

    The left has been on the warpath(forgive the pun)lately about how the name of the NFL team “Redskins” is derogatory. Can a word be derogatory if the people it is describing don’t find it derogatory? Isn’t it simply more of the left saying I know better than you and is choosing to be offended on their behalf? Those that mine history for sins are not searching for truth but for opportunities to denigrate their opponents and be able to cash in today. As John Steinbeck said “The Indians survived our open intention of wiping them out and since the tide has turned they have even weathered our good intentions toward them which can be much more deadly.”

    The bottom line in all this is in American politics today reality fades and politics becomes the art of provocation advanced in campaigns where prejudice and passion take the place of intelligent analysis. The mercenaries of liberal policies within the republican party understands this just as well as the left and feel they will be able to use this in dealing with the Tea Party and thus cease being an empty husk.

    http://www.news4jax.com/news/grayson-uses-burning-cross-to-decry-tea-party-raise-money/-/475880/22576618/-/8ikccc/-/index.html

  • Bill Hedges

    bob is just as dishonest. Clean your own house. Get it in order. Check my comment prior to your last comment…

    “Self serving self righteousness” misquoting me &/or OUT OF CONTEXT. There IS A TERM USED in court called “clean hands”. Your hands are DIRTY and your case would be dismissed.

    You give NO indication of apology nor minimally a CHANGE IN BEHAVIOR…

  • Bob

    “FOLDING LIKE A CHEAP TENT”

    The article entitled: “Issa Confirms: Drafting Bill To Grant Legal Status to Some Illegal Aliens”

    http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/10/23/Exclusive-Darrell-Issa-confirms-he-is-drafting-bill-that-would-grant-legal-status-to-some-illegal-immigrants

  • Bob

    “ISSA,ISSA,ISSA,”

    Here is an article that provides a bit more insight on the immigration bill Darrell Issa is intending to propose next week.

    Obviously this is simply an effort to repair the image of the GOP that took a hit with the shutdown. HOWEVER when the inception of Obamacare is floundering THE STRATEGY OF THE republicans SHOULDN’T BE TO HELP DISTRACT THE ATTENTION AWAY FROM IT BY TACKLING ANOTHER PROBLEM. Secondly do you really believe Congress will revoke ANYONES STATUS AFTER 6 YEARS? Lastly if you are going to do this piecemeal AS WAS THE ORIGINAL INTENTION OF THE HOUSE make sure border security tops the list of priorities.

    There doesn’t seem to be much difference between this proposal and the “Gang Of Eights” and therefore it wouldn’t need many republicans to sign on in order to pass.

    http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=178039D6-530E-4E27-991B-2B9E24005E43

  • Bob

    The republicans should realize by now President Obama doesn’t believe in negotiations no less strictly enforcing the “letter of the Law” when it comes to immigration.Proof of the pudding would be HIS DEFERMENTS TO ILLEGAL ALIEN HISPANIC YOUTH IN JUNE OF 2012 JUST PRIOR TO THE 2012 ELECTION.

    The article entitled: “Secretary Napolitano Announces Deferred Action Process For Young People Who Are Low Enforcement Priorities”

    http://www.dhs.gov/news/2012/06/15/secretary-napolitano-announces-deferred-action-process-young-people-who-are-low

  • Bill Hedges

    bob draws his conclusions:

    “Obviously this is simply an effort to repair the image of the GOP that took a hit with the shutdown. HOWEVER when the inception of Obamacare is floundering THE STRATEGY OF THE republicans SHOULDN’T BE TO HELP DISTRACT THE ATTENTION AWAY FROM IT BY TACKLING ANOTHER PROBLEM”

    1. “…inception of Obamacare is floundering”

    CBO says WE CAN NOT AFFORD bumcare. Supreme Court threw a wrench into the mix. States can OPT OUT.

    AS I have previous clearly stated, the “proof is in the pudding”. More or less those who will/won’t sign up with bumcare, will have done so around first of year. Those with access to online, conceivably are finding out THEIR OPTION now. How does bumcare affect the pocketbook & are they getting a GOOD DEAL. “Are they better off”….. Election changing bricks & motor.

    1. “Obamacare is floundering”

    Is premature to determine. Voters NOW are in process of ingesting bumcare. Will their stomach TURN sour ??? If Republican are wrong & voters DON’T SEE RED come actualization of bumcare realism, well WE’VE forced TO re-evaluate our stance against bumcare. IF our belief HOLDS TRUE, ANOTHER 2010 BUT magnified election results seem plausible. BUMCARE gave us control of House. Realization we were correct on bumcare SHOULD give us Senate & WH.

    2. “Obviously this is simply an effort to repair the image of the GOP that took a hit with the shutdown”

    NO. Isn’t “obviously …”

    First off WHAT WOULD YOU have Republicans DO ??? Secede From The Union ??? Sometimes the cards must be dealt in game of poker to discover who walks home with more coins in their pocket. Do we take home coin OR TITLE TO CARS ???

    We have reached the _ cul·mi·na·tion _ concerning bumcare. The game must proceed to see who FALLS & WHO STAYS on TOP.

    2. “HELP DISTRACT THE ATTENTION AWAY FROM IT BY TACKLING ANOTHER PROBLEM”

    NO. AS explained. In addition, sitting ON THEIR thumbs seem GOOD tactic to bob ? The dye has been cast for bumcare. What’s next bob ? bumcare is on backburner COOKING. ARE WE a ONE ISSUE Party ???

    3. Reagan sought immigration reform with STRICTLY controlled BOADERS. AS I remember my history, Teddie K. impeded the controlled boarders portion.

    IS buma serious about immigration ? Now in 7th inning of his _ stinch _ as president. Was buma FOR equal rights for women, when buma’s WH pays women less ?
    __

    Is a FACT THAT “The republicans should realize by now President Obama doesn’t believe in negotiations no less strictly enforcing the “letter of the Law” when it comes to immigration”.

    More so, is a FACT THAT bob’s LIES which should be considered criminal altering meaning of my quotes AS WELL AS taking OUT OF CONTEXT. With NO remorse visible, term “Roma” SHOULD be etched upon his behind…

  • Bill Hedges

    Obviously 2 was repeated by accident…

  • Bob

    From the article entitled: “THE ART OF THE IMPOSSIBLE”
    By Andrew McCarthy 19th October 2013

    “Virtually all congressional republicans elected or re-elected since 2010 ran on that promise.Stopping Obamacare is the cause that most animated the conservative base,without which there would be no republican majority in the House.If republicans expected to maintain that support,they had to act on that commitment.”

    Inertia is a powerful non-motivator. It is always extremely tempting to avoid the hard thing that must be done now by rationalizing that we’ll have both the capability and the stomach to do the hard thing at some indeterminate future time. That is the main appeal of the GOP establishment strategy: It is outlandish,but unlike defund/delay it is hard to disprove in the present because it’s impossible assumption are conveniently imagined to occur several years from now,in a brighter and shinier future.”

    “TO BUY IT ,YOU FIRST HAVE TO BELIEVE THAT THE GOP IS SUDDENLY GOING TO BECOME AN ELECTORIAL JUGGERNAUT. Mind you we are talking about republicans who have won the popular vote in a presidential election only once since 1988;who are rapidly losing the confidence of the conservative base that gave the GOP the historic midterm victory in 2010;and who’s current priorities include a mass legalization of (Democrat leaning) illegal immigrants that would make it increasingly difficult for republicans to win elections in the future. WE ARE TO BELIEVE, MOREOVER THAT THIS ELECTORIAL JUGGERNAUT IS POISED TO TAKE OFF IN THE CYCLE RIGHT AFTER THE GOP LOST TO OBAMA AND LOST CONGRESSIONAL SEATS DESPITE HIGH UNEMPLOYMENT AND NO ECONOMIC GROWTH.”

    “TO REPEAL OBAMACARE ON THE ESTABLISHMENT PLAN ,THE GOP NEEDS SUDDEN AND SUSTAINED ELECTORIAL SUCESS DESPITE THE HIGH HURDLE OF MEDIA BIAS.AT LEAST TWO FEDERAL ELECTION CYCLES, AND MORE LIKELY THREE OR MORE WILL BE NECESSARY. Obama after all will still be president for three more years and will never sign a repeal bill. EVEN IF A REPUBLICAN WINS THE WHITE HOUSE IN 2016,AND EVEN IF REPUBLICANS BY THEN HAVE HELD THE HOUSE AND WON THE SENATE ,THE GOP WILL NOT HAVE AN OVERWHELMING CONGRESSIONAL MAJORITY.”

    “Furthermore unlike Senate republicans, senate Democrats are unified and disciplined. Knowing the press is the wind at their backs they are disposed to use every parliamentary privilege available as a minority to obstruct a repeal of Obamacare. Remember Democrats unilaterally enacted Obamacare at a time when it was very unpopular AND SEEMED LIKELY TO COST THEM DEARLY AT THE BALLOT BOX.But they are influenced by movement progressives to a far greater degree than the Tea Party influences republicans.SO IMPORTANT WAS SOCIALIZED MEDICINE TO THE LEFT THAT DEMOCRATS RAMMED OBAMACARE THROUGH ,REGARDLESS OF THE LIKELY ELECTORIAL CONSEQUENCES.THEY ARE GOING TO FIGHT REPEAL TO THE DEATH.”

    “The Democrats, the media and all the left will tirelessly portray any proposed repeal of Obamacare as a callous denial…a removal….of coverage from millions of underprivileged Americans, including those struggling with sickness.Moderates and “COMPASSIONATE CONSERVATIVES” ALREADY LECTURE US ABOUT THE NEED TO GET REAL AND MAKE OUR PEACE WITH THE WELFARE STATE; what will they be saying four or six or eight or who knows how many years from now? They will be arguing that Obamacare’s prodigious infrastructure is now part of our social fabric…that repealing it at this point would be radical……….”

    “Pessimistic as I was, however I had far greater confidence in the Supreme court than I do in the prospect of republicans repealing Obamacare once it has been up and running for a few years……..I believe there is no chance that will happen. I also believe the republican establishment, in it’s heart of hearts, realize how implausible this prospect is.”

    http://www.nationalreview.com/node/361655/print

    In other words IT’S JUST MORE EMPTY RHETORIC FROM THE ESTABLISHMENT republicans ABOUT KICKING THE CAN DOWN THE ROAD LIKE EVERYTHING ELSE THEY DO !

  • Bill Hedges

    On a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being highest, bob is a (-) 10 for believability:

    Tora, Tora, Tora Bill Hedges Jun 2nd, 2013 at 5:17 pm”
    1.
    “SOME DEEP THINKING” by bob ? N E V E R. INABILITY…
    ______ HELP POLICE !!! ______________ Arrest bob for literature fraud _____ Call 911 _______________
    Fraud
    “A false representation of a matter of fact—whether by words or by conduct, by false or misleading allegations, or by concealment of what should have been disclosed—that deceives and is intended to deceive another so that the individual will act upon it to her or his legal injury.”
    “Fraud is commonly understood as dishonesty calculated for advantage. A person who is dishonest may be called a fraud. In the U.S. legal system, fraud is a specific offense with certain features”
    http://legal-dictionary.t……com/fraud
    SUCH *** an·i·mos·i·ty *** shown. *** in·tim·i·da·tion *** doesn’t work OVER HERE. There is no *** am·bi·gu·i·ty ***. bob owes a apology for:
    A. bob partial quotes me. Leaving out the most pertinent part of my quote:
    “I watch a lot of movies.Have ban most politics from my cable.”
    I wrote:
    I watch a lot of movies. Have ban most politics from my cable. I research online.
    B. bob leaves off KEY PART OF MY QUOTE, then says:
    “I was taught that if you didn’t know what you were talking about as is clearly evident here YOU KEEP YOUR MOUTH SHUT AND NOT EMBARRASS YOURSELF!”
    bob neither *** a·pol·o·gies *** nor shows any sign of remorse. SHAMEFUL…
    __

    This doesn’t go into bob’s “Yogi” & other misquotes or OUT OF CONTEXT.

    POLLS SHOWED madness at government shut down & possible default on government loans, were NOT ACCEPTABLE. Republicans got hit HARD. ……….HARDER HIT TEA.

    bob can say “KICKING THE CAN DOWN THE ROAD LIKE EVERYTHING ELSE THEY DO !” ……. SO……. WHAT !!!…..That “can” is going “down the road” until first of year and maybe a little future. WE Haven’t the votes to stop bumcare. Countless TRIES affirm. IF bumcare is BAD, VOTERS will respond. Period.

    If majority of voters support bumcare at the voting booth (D) win. If first of the year ENOUGH say enough of bumcare, WE WIN.

    THE Supreme Court HAS RULED. I know of NO OTHER cases involving bumcare AT THIS TIME…

  • Bill Hedges

    Why didn’t bob NOT, NOT, NOT give the title of his last link ? “Hail Mary” is close. Last link bob gave title:

    “The Art of the Impossible”
    “The strategy to repeal Obamacare by winning serial elections is not even a Hail Mary pass.”

    “Alternatively, there was Option Two: Because, as a matter of law, Obamacare could not proceed unless both congressional chambers agreed to fund it, and because Republicans control the House, House Republicans could deny it funding. The hope was that Obamacare’s unpopularity and patent unreadiness, coupled with the Democrats’ desire for the rest of government to be funded at today’s exorbitant levels, would pressure the Senate and the president to agree to a delay. Option Two would be tough to pull off, but it was not exclusive of Option One; and, contrary to conventional wisdom, there was the chance that the memory of any government shutdown would fade quickly while raising public consciousness about Obamacare’s downsides would have enduring electoral benefits.”

    http://www.nationalreview.com/node/361655/print

    SURE. CONGRESS COULD not fund bumcare:

    “Congress has every incentive to take action and defund Obamacare this fall. The law’s exchanges are scheduled to open for enrollment on October 1 and will start accepting applications for subsidized insurance plans taking effect on January 1, 2014. According to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), next year federal taxpayers will subsidize exchange insurance plans for 6 million Americans and fund a Medicaid expansion covering an additional 9 million enrollees.[4] Over time, spending on Obamacare will explode. The CBO projects that spending on these two new subsidies will grow from $48 billion in fiscal year 2014 to $250 billion in 2023—a more than five-fold increase.[5]”

    “The list of Obamacare’s failures grows by the day.[6] It is not that portions of the law are unworkable—the entire law is unworkable. Absent the law’s complete repeal, only full defunding would ensure that the American people are not subjected to any of these destructive policies. Congress can do its part in remedying these failures by using its all-important “power of the purse” to set a very clear line in the sand: not one single dime to fund Obamacare.”

    http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2013/07/defunding-obamacare-the-next-best-option

    “COPY & paste” WHEN you quote me in CONTEXT bob.

    To kill bumcare, WE needed Senate to agree with House. Wouldn’t, couldn’t, BUT Should of.

    Funding for bumcare, Senate NEEDS US to agree. Oh, (D) is going to NAME CALL US, as bob use to naughty list against me. IF voters AGREE bumcare is BAD, (D) name calling GOES ON DEAF EARS. WE win. THEY loss.

    AS Heritage Foundation article shows, bumcare gets WORSE over time.

    Killing bumcare WAS a far fetched pipe dream with McCain saying so MORE or LESS. OWNING House, WE CAN STOP bumcare FUNDING. THIS IS….. THE LINE IN THE SAND ….. killing bumcare requires indignation at reality of bumcare BY voters. How (D) lied concerning bumcare. Majority of voters … Decide … Better off before or after bumcare implementation. Maybe that is not exactly correct. Voters are seeing there bumcare choices. The cost. ETC. HAPPY ?????????????

  • Bill Hedges

    SHOUULD BE_ Why did bob NOT, NOT, NOT…

  • Bob

    John McCain delivers the “DEMOCRATIC RESPONSE” to Senator Cruz’s 21 hour senate floor speech

    http://hotair.com/archives/2013/09/25/video-mccain-delivers-the-democratic-response-to-cruz/

  • Bob

    John McCain(HYPOCRITE-AZ) EVOKES PRESIDENT REAGANS 11TH COMMANDMENT OF “DON’T SPEAK ILL OF YOUR FELLOW REPUBLICANS”

    (SEE ABOVE POST DATED 25TH OCTOBER 212:58am)

    http://www.politico.com/story/2013/10/john-mccain-republicans-government-shutdown-98462.html?ml=la

  • Bill Hedges

    bob relies on dishonest trickery:

    “Doctor Yogi Esq” ???

    I don’t speak of my line of work online. Those who do so I general don’t believe. As I said:

    Theme flowing through bob’s remarks is DISHONESTY. IS THIS A trait of “wacho birds” OR just bob is still to be determined. bob tries to appear as being a clairvoyant saying I didn’t mean to use A CERTAIN WORD. bob had ANOTHER WORD more to bob’s liking “definitely”. Mockingly, I hope bob gives approval to my use of the word __ clairvoyant __:

    “Ah Yes, As Predicted 2013/10/01 at 4:04 pm”

    More OUT OF CONTEXT bob:

    “You should read my comments prior to entering this site.”
    Bill Hedges

    What I said was:

    You should read my comments prior to you entering this site. My knowledge of history goes well past Newt. Didn’t know you scanned my brain to determine my knowledge of conservatism past Newt. REMARKABLE…
    __

    Thought you gave me a:

    “GOOD NIGHT”

    BOB WROTE:

    “Why do I feel like I’m having a conversation with Yogi Berra?”

    BECAUSE you can not read in context. How many times MUST I PROVE ????

    “Ah Yes, As Predicted Bob 2013/10/01 at 3:52 pm”

    “You should always go to other peoples funerals or else they won’t come to yours.”……..Yogi Berra

    “You should read my comments prior to entering this site.”
    Bill Hedges

    “Why do I feel like I’m having a conversation with Yogi Berra?”
    __

    Give bob his due. Consistent dishonesty through MISQUOTES and/or OUT OF CONTEXT…

  • Bill Hedges

    What DOES “John McCain(HYPOCRITE-AZ) EVOKES PRESIDENT REAGANS 11TH COMMANDMENT OF “DON’T SPEAK ILL OF YOUR FELLOW REPUBLICANS” HAVE TO DO with THE PRICE OF RICE IN CHINA ?

    Cruz had no chance of winning. Even one of your links said we would have to win numerous election to have votes to KILL BUMCARE (BY THEN too late). WHAT CHANCE did Cruz have of being TOP GUN shooting bumcare out of sky ? As McCain insinuated NONE.

    YOU HAVE no reason to believe THERE WAS death knocking on door to bumcare. Republicans exhausted the legitimate possibilities. You bad mouthed individual, like John Mc., as well as “republican establishment”. What you don’t provide IS HOW Cruz WAS TO WIN. Every single (R) & (I) could not bring bumcare down, TO BREAK in a million pieces. McCain WAS correct.

    Your side bar antics can not reflect different facts, THAT, bumcare could not be un-law of land by vote in Congress. NO “if, &, or BUT”.

    My final word on this, on this article, is SIMPLE. If bumcare tears a NEW HOLE in voters that are unwanted, is very conceivable bumcare WILL BE excommunicated from THE LAW OF THE LAND. WITHOUT that or Divine intervention, learn to LOVE the destruction bumcare will bring upon this Nation. Adding to THE REAL DEBT OF $$$ 60 some odd TRILLION.

    On this article, I leave you to your fantasies…

  • Bill Hedges

    FORGOT TO ADD. From bob’s link:

    “Some place along the line, we forgot Ronald Reagan’s 11th commandment,” he added. “You know what it was? Don’t speak ill of your fellow Republicans. We’ve done way too much of that.”

    http://www.politico.com/story/2013/10/john-mccain-republicans-government-shutdown-98462.html#ixzz2ilgKdYge

    bob wrote:

    “John McCain(HYPOCRITE-AZ) EVOKES PRESIDENT REAGANS 11TH COMMANDMENT OF “DON’T SPEAK ILL OF YOUR FELLOW REPUBLICANS”

    “HYPOCRITE” hardly. He included himself.

    Seems obvious to me after a fierce battle, John was attempting reconciliation within the Republican Party. As well as saying Mr. President YOU WON. NOW LET’S SIT DOWN & talk.

    Didn’t Landreaux state he was a negotiator ? After a knock-out, dragged out session between opposing groups, seems to me a perfectly acceptable attempt at better relations. Begin the healing process.

    bob wants to hold the gun pointed exclusively at John’s head in this. Gun being “HYPOCRITE”. Makes bob re-writing HISTORY again. bob re-writes my quotes and takes OUT OF CONTEXT. IS THIS what being extremist MEANS ? IRRATIONAL thinking process…

    Many times bob will quote from his links. NOT SO here. IN CONTEXT, John quote would DULL bob’s “HYPOCRITE” baloney bull…

  • Bob

    It seems SENATOR MCCAIN(HYPOCTITE-AZ)ONLY HAS CONSERVATIVE PRINCIPLES WHEN ELECTION TIME COMES AROUND.THE LEADER OF THE SENATE GANG OF EIGHT ON IMMIGRATION WAS ALL FOR BUILDING A FENCE TO KEEP ILLEGALS OUT PRIOR TO BEING RE-ELECTED!

    Video entitled;” Complete the Danged Fence”

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r0lwusMxiHc

    Oh yeah! Contrary to my opponents attempt to canonize the Senator into sainthood he showed no remorse about his part on joining the Democratic attack on Senator Cruz after the shutdown.HE ISN’T THE DARLING OF THE LIBERAL PRESS AND DIDN’T GET THE NICKNAME “MAVERICK’ FOR NOTHING.WHY DO YOU SUPPOSE HE WAS SO DISLIKED BY CONSERVATIVES IN 2008?

  • Bill Hedges

    “An Insane Ted Cruz Claims He Had Nothing to Do With the Government Shutdown That He Caused”

    http://www.politicususa.com/2013/10/20/ted-cruz-claims-government-shutdown-caused.html

    Don’t you LOVE EXAGGERATED, unsubstantiated statements bob gives. There was “11TH COMMANDMENT OF “DON’T SPEAK ILL OF YOUR FELLOW REPUBLICANS” that came tumbling down. Now:

    “HE ISN’T THE DARLING OF THE LIBERAL PRESS AND DIDN’T GET THE NICKNAME “MAVERICK’ FOR NOTHING.WHY DO YOU SUPPOSE HE WAS SO DISLIKED BY CONSERVATIVES IN 2008?”…

    bob is entitled to opinion. A proven fact of course NOT. Just extremist “wacho bird” protecting Cruz…

  • Bob

    “ABOUT THAT 11th COMMANDMENT SENATOR?”

    It’s ironic that Senator McCain bashes Ted Cruz and
    Mike Lee for attacking other republicans for not going along with his proposals.One of the common threads of the Senator is ruthlessly attacking fellow republicans who don’t back his policy initiatives including intervening in Syria civil war on the side of the Al Qaeda and Senator Rand Paul’s 13 hour marathon(6 March 2013) on the use of drones against Americans. WHILE SENATOR PAUL IS GIVING THIS SPEECH SENATOR MCCAIN IS HAVING DINNER WITH THE PRESIDENT. The next day Senator McCain DELIVERS THE DEMOCRATIC RESPONSE (perhaps the president gave him talking points…he’s getting quite experienced at giving it)attacking Senator Paul.

    The article entitled: “John McCain, Lindsey Graham Attack Rand Paul For Marathon 13 Hour Filibuster”

    http://www.examiner.com/article/john-mccain-lindsey-graham-attack-rand-paul-for-marathon-13-hour-filibuster

  • Bob

    I know how much “PROOF” is appreciated on this site so here is an article telling of the dinner with the President the night before and who attended.

    The article is entitled: “republican Senators Share Candid Dinner With Obama”

    http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2013-03-06/news/sns-rt-us-usa-fiscal-hoevenbre926065-20130306_1_republican-senators-republicans-and-democrats-white-house

    “Don’t you love exaggerated unsubstantiated statements Bob gives”
    Bill Hedges 25 October @ 11:16PM

    LMAO…….Meanwhile the article you give reads “An Insane Ted Cruz Claims He Had Nothing To Do With The Government Shutdown That He Caused”and from a web site that uses in it’s masthead “REAL LIBERAL POLITICS”…talk about hypocrites!

    NO COMMENTS ON THE VIDEOS I HAVE BEEN POSTING SHOWING HYPOCRITE MCCAIN I NOTICE HOWEVER

  • Bob

    “SENATOR HYPOCRITE”

    The mans amazing. Not only is he a hypocrite but he sells out the GOP BY SUBSTANUATING THEY ARE CONDUCTING A “WAR ON WOMEN”

    The article entitled: “After Backing Anti-Birth Control Blunt Amendment McCain Now Says GOP Needs To Get Off War On Women”

    http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2012/03/18/446721/after-backing-anti-birth-control-blunt-amendment-mccain-now-says-gop-needs-to-get-off-war-on-women/

  • Bill Hedges

    Haven’t been discussing boarder. I know, I know. You want to change subject.

    My link HAS in line link substantiating case against Cruz. You don’t like liberal link, THEN DISPROVE. DON’T COMPLAIN. BABIES cry. In debate YOU PROVE. Would LOSE MOST DEBATES WITH opinions. YOU NEVER disproved the few Huffington.com links I used. You said YOU COULD. Best you got is “and from a web site that uses in it’s masthead “REAL LIBERAL POLITICS”…talk about hypocrites!” Crybaby NOT DISPROVE. Pathetic. Is that liberal site Cruz was on ??? Is he liberal ??? Using bob logic. HEY, BUMA appeared on FOX. Does that make buma CONSERVATIVE ??? GET A HONEST storyline. Republicans go on liberal news media, and Demos go on conservative sites. What’s the big DEAL ??? Haven’t you noticed ?

    You use “hypocrites” like I use salt. Salt is used often on my kitchen table.
    __

    On your last link, so they tried to reach an agreement and it didn’t work. SOOOOOOOOOOO… Can’t win each time. Babe Ruth knocked a lot of HOME RUNS. He struck out MUCH MORE. A useless and pointless link. NO MEAT to our discussion in “republican Senators Share Candid Dinner With Obama”.
    __

    I see ONCE AGAIN you want to change subject to birth control. That liberal link of mine sure had Cruz soiling his diaper. Means time for bob to SKIP OVER. BOARDER then THIS. What is next to distract ??? POT ???

  • Bill Hedges

    Cruz had NO REASON to believe he could get bumcare outlawed. bob gave no evidence to support THAT Cruz COULD.

    If majority of folks don’t like bumcare as they purchase their health insurance, THEN WE WIN. If majority like, we lose.

    “Mr. Cruz’s actions weren’t wrong because they failed. They were wrong because they were ill-considered, imprudent, selfish, and harmful to his party and the conservative cause. He didn’t achieve anything he insisted he would–and, in the process, he set back conservatism in several respects. Liberals must be thanking their lucky stars for the junior senator from Texas”

    http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2013/10/11/why-ted-cruz-is-now-discredited/

  • Bob

    There isn’t much difference between the Democrats and the “Vichy republicans we have in Washington.The disagreement between statist Democrats and establishment republicans is about the degree of government intrusion not in the principle of government intrusion. Todays Vichy republicans are the George W. Bush “We have a responsibility that when somebody hurts government has got to move” variety not the limited government variety of President Reagan.There is where we get the party being as popular as a colonoscopy or root canal.THERE IS WHERE WE GET THE PERENNIAL RINO SELLOUTS! AND SENATORS McCain AND Lindsey ARE THE LEADERS !

    The republican establishment thinks it can harvest the ideological energy of the conservative movement when it needs to give Senator McCains dying 2008 campaign CPR but didn’t expect us to form the Tea Party and lead the protest against the same big government practices when they are done by the Vichy republicans. Bread and circuses is not the policy of a republic but rather of an empire entering moral senescence. Reading and following the “RNC AUTOPSY REPORT WILL ONLY LEAD TO THE RNC READING THEIR OBITUARY!

    If I had to spend time attempting to disprove every LIBERAL SITE ACCUSATIONS I would probably be taken in by their Kool-Aid like yourself and joined the dark side. You are well aware that the purpose of my links discussing Birth control and other subjects is to show the hypocrisy of Senator McCain which you are attempting to avoid and YOU ARE THE ONE WHO IS GUILTY OF CHANGING THE SUBJECT!

  • Bill Hedges

    “Reading and following the “RNC AUTOPSY REPORT WILL ONLY LEAD TO THE RNC READING THEIR OBITUARY!”

    Dramatic BUT lacks luster. I’m not going to argue ideology. Is VERY opinion oriented. Again, again, again, again bob wants ___ Cruz ___ OFF THE TABLE. Not going to talk about Bush & Reagan or limited government. Nor “Senator McCains dying 2008”.

    bob wrote:

    “You are well aware that the purpose of my links discussing Birth control and other subjects is to show the hypocrisy of Senator McCain which you are attempting to avoid and YOU ARE THE ONE WHO IS GUILTY OF CHANGING THE SUBJECT!”

    WHAT IS the subject bob ??? You didn’t say except to say IS I who wants to change subject. Is subject Bush ? Reagan ? McCain ? What ? How about Cruz and recent events on Capital Hill. What does McCain change of opinion possibility on boarder & birth control have to do with BUMCARE & debt ceiling. You blew a fuse with me using McCain to denigrate Cruz IN YOUR EYES.

    You say “…show the hypocrisy of Senator McCain”. That’s your recent TOPIC. That’s YOUR change of topic.

    __________
    __________

    My last comment was SPOT ON topic. In summation, Cruz had NO REASON to believe he could get bumcare outlawed. bob gave no evidence to support THAT Cruz COULD.

    Cruz got caught lying…
    __________
    __________

    One of bob’s first statement on this article was:

    “The article entitled: “The GOP Shutdown Is Sedition And Shouldn’t Be Forgiven”

    http://www.huffingtonpost…..79692.html

    Not about McCain. IS Huffington a LINERAL site ??? What did bob say in his last comment ???:

    “If I had to spend time attempting to disprove every LIBERAL SITE ACCUSATIONS I would probably be taken in by their Kool-Aid like yourself and joined the dark side”
    __

    bob writes:

    “You are well aware that the purpose of my links discussing Birth control and other subjects is to show the hypocrisy of Senator McCain…”

    Be GLAD to discuss. This discussion is settled:

    My last comment was SPOT ON topic. In summation, Cruz had NO REASON to believe he could get bumcare outlawed. bob gave no evidence to support THAT Cruz COULD.

    Adding, Republican got hit hard in polls BUT TEA even harder along with Cruz.

    ………. SPECIAL NOTATION ……….

    One requirement. Have caught you TOO MANY TIMES rewriting history by re-writing my quotes & taking OUT OF CONTEXT. You must show a acknowledgement of remorse. A MAN OF HONOR would have corrected & done sooooo long ago. YOU REALIZE what position THAT leaves YOU IN.

    TO talk about your SO CALLED accusation, “show the hypocrisy of Senator McCain”, you must enter WITH CLEAN HANDS. YOUR dishonesty IS ………. _ des·pi·ca·ble _ …

  • Bill Hedges

    NOT LINERAL site BUT liberal site…

  • Bill Hedges

    bob complains I use liberal sites. bon uses liberal sites. bob say he can disprove liberal sites but can’t. Then bob says:

    “If I had to spend time attempting to disprove every LIBERAL SITE ACCUSATIONS I would probably be taken in by their Kool-Aid like yourself and joined the dark side”

    Excuses. bob ANGS the truth…

    WHAT A farce YOU ARE. if YOU DON’T LIE/EXAGGERATE you keep your bumbling straight.

    NOW pick & chose the least damning portion to you in my comment. Try to rise the Phoenix bird…

  • Bill Hedges

    Not bon BUT bob. NOT ANGS BUT changes the truth.

  • Bob

    LMAO…….BACK TO THE DOG CHASING HIS TAIL TACTIC AGAIN!

    OK HERE GOES: All items below are on the “Encouraging our Enemies” thread
    In regard to me using the “Huffington Post “as a link it was done to prove how liberal they are in my attack of the “Bunk House Lawyers” see 18th October @ 11:43PM.I couldn’t very well do that without using their link.

    The New York Times I used as proof of a story concerning the NSA spying scandal not as proof in an discussion we were having. If the story was on FOX I would have used that but the New York Times and London Guardian have EXCLUSIVE RIGHTS to Edward Snowdons papers.

    In regard to the reason the shutdown was the right thing to do AND THE ESTABLISHMENT republican ALTERNATIVE WOULDN’T WORK SEE 24TH October @9:10PM also see “MESSAGING STUPID” thread dated 17th October @ 4:22PM

    In regard to Senator Cruz see 20th October @5:26PM

    In regard to why trying to have a discussion with you is impossible see “Randomizing thread dated 14th October @7:50 PM and “Shutdown Slowdown” thread dated 11th October @9:38AM

    I didn’t avoid your topics you just don’t like the answers I give and play games making accusations and attempting to tire out people with your dog chasing his tail arguments.

  • Bill Hedges

    The count on this article will be over 80 as of this comment. Far exceeding many, many, many comments on so many, many, many articles here.

    If I string along with bob, leaving embarrassing Cruz and bumcare/debt ceiling discussion (to bob), WELL OVER 100 is most assured. Added incentive to change subject for bob, CRUZ stops getting beat up…

  • Bill Hedges

    bob doesn’t want to discuss “hypocrisy of Senator McCain…”

    Why do I say that ? As I previously said:

    ………. SPECIAL NOTATION ……….

    One requirement. Have caught you TOO MANY TIMES rewriting history by re-writing my quotes & taking OUT OF CONTEXT. You must show a acknowledgement of remorse. A MAN OF HONOR would have corrected & done sooooo long ago. YOU REALIZE what position THAT leaves YOU IN.

    TO talk about your SO CALLED accusation, “show the hypocrisy of Senator McCain”, you must enter WITH CLEAN HANDS. YOUR dishonesty IS ………. _ des·pi·ca·ble _ …

    ____

    “Reading and following the “RNC AUTOPSY REPORT WILL ONLY LEAD TO THE RNC READING THEIR OBITUARY!”

    YOU DO REALIZE HOW ridiculous you comment IS bob ???

    Dramatic BUT lacks luster. I’m not going to argue ideology. Is VERY opinion oriented. Again, again, again, again bob wants ___ Cruz ___ OFF THE TABLE. Not going to talk about Bush & Reagan or limited government. Nor “Senator McCains dying 2008?.

    bob wrote:

    “You are well aware that the purpose of my links discussing Birth control and other subjects is to show the hypocrisy of Senator McCain which you are attempting to avoid and YOU ARE THE ONE WHO IS GUILTY OF CHANGING THE SUBJECT!”

    WHAT IS the subject bob ??? You didn’t say except to say IS I who wants to change subject. Is subject Bush ? Reagan ? McCain ? What ? How about Cruz and recent events on Capital Hill. What does McCain change of opinion possibility on boarder & birth control have to do with BUMCARE & debt ceiling. You blew a fuse with me using McCain to denigrate Cruz IN YOUR EYES.

    You say “…show the hypocrisy of Senator McCain”. That’s your recent TOPIC. That’s YOUR change of topic.

    __________
    __________ The topic

    My last comment was SPOT ON topic. In summation, Cruz had NO REASON to believe he could get bumcare outlawed. bob gave no evidence to support THAT Cruz COULD.

    Cruz got caught lying…
    __________
    __________

    One of bob’s first statement on this article was:

    “The article entitled: “The GOP Shutdown Is Sedition And Shouldn’t Be Forgiven”

    http://www.huffingtonpost…..79692.html

    Not about McCain. IS Huffington a LIBERAL site ??? What did bob say in his last comment ???:

    “If I had to spend time attempting to disprove every LIBERAL SITE ACCUSATIONS I would probably be taken in by their Kool-Aid like yourself and joined the dark side”
    __

    bob writes:

    “You are well aware that the purpose of my links discussing Birth control and other subjects is to show the hypocrisy of Senator McCain…”

    Be GLAD to discuss. This discussion is settled:

    My last comment was SPOT ON topic. In summation, Cruz had NO REASON to believe he could get bumcare outlawed. bob gave no evidence to support THAT Cruz COULD.

    Adding, Republican got hit hard in polls BUT TEA even harder along with Cruz.

    ………. SPECIAL NOTATION ……….

    One requirement. Have caught you TOO MANY TIMES rewriting history by re-writing my quotes & taking OUT OF CONTEXT. You must show a acknowledgement of remorse. A MAN OF HONOR would have corrected & done sooooo long ago. YOU REALIZE what position THAT leaves YOU IN.

    TO talk about your SO CALLED accusation, “show the hypocrisy of Senator McCain”, you must enter WITH CLEAN HANDS. YOUR dishonesty IS ………. _ des·pi·ca·ble _ …

  • Bill Hedges

    bob wrote:

    “LMAO…….BACK TO THE DOG CHASING HIS TAIL TACTIC AGAIN!”

    You could start your own blog. That was your suggestion to me. I personal don’t INTEND ON DOING IT…

    __

    bob writes:

    “You are well aware that the purpose of my links discussing Birth control and other subjects is to show the hypocrisy of Senator McCain…”

    Be GLAD to discuss. This discussion is settled:

    My last comment was SPOT ON topic. In summation, Cruz had NO REASON to believe he could get bumcare outlawed. bob gave no evidence to support THAT Cruz COULD.

    Adding, Republican got hit hard in polls BUT TEA even harder along with Cruz.

    ………. SPECIAL NOTATION ……….

    One requirement. Have caught you TOO MANY TIMES rewriting history by re-writing my quotes & taking OUT OF CONTEXT. You must show a acknowledgement of remorse. A MAN OF HONOR would have corrected & done sooooo long ago. YOU REALIZE what position THAT leaves YOU IN.

    TO talk about your SO CALLED accusation, “show the hypocrisy of Senator McCain”, you must enter WITH CLEAN HANDS. YOUR dishonesty IS ………. _ des·pi·ca·ble _ …

  • Bob

    I thought you said 80 something post is enough?

    BUT IF YOU INSIST:”THE HYPOCRISCY OF BILL HEDGES

    “As I agree and do I place Politico and Huffington on the same playing field. Neither own the truth. Closest owners are American Thinker and Heritage Foundation.I FIND FALSEHOOD IN A ARTICLE THAT ARTICLE IS WORTHLESS FROM BEGINNING TO END.TAINTED”
    Bill Hedges”Encouraging our Enemies” thread dated 23 October@2:36PM

    ……………………………………………………….

    “I pick the Huffington link I WILL USE ONES WITH FACTS I AGREE WITH. Like I said previously some conservative sites are far to emotional and beyond my comfort level. Conservative articles are not all true with all liberal articles all false. Every move buma takes is not wrong.
    Bill Hedges”Encouraging Our Enemies” thread dated 19 October@12:29AM
    ……………………………………………

    And so it appears you feel you are allowed to cherry pick sites that you deem “WORTHLESS” and “USE ONES WITH FACTS YOU AGREE WITH” But I can’t say “Huffington” or any other liberal site is worthless? IT DOESN’T WORK THAT WAY!

    THE ANSWER TO YOUR 4:52PM GIBBERISH IS IN MY POST OF 4:20PM

  • Bill Hedges

    bob wrote:

    “I thought you said 80 something post is enough?”

    NO bob. You DON’T __ thunk ___. I wrote:

    The count on this article will be over 80 as of this comment. Far exceeding many, many, many comments on so many, many, many articles here

    NOW my actual quote is but a few comments ago on same article. STILL, STILL,STILL, STILL,STILL, STILL,STILL, STILL, STILL, STILL,STILL, STILL,STILL, STILL,STILL, STILL what do you do ??? Don’t come close to saying WHAT I SAID. ___ You are incompetent ____.

    __

    bob wrote:

    “You are well aware that the purpose of my links discussing Birth control and other subjects is to show the hypocrisy of Senator McCain…”

    Be GLAD to discuss. This discussion is settled:

    My last comment was SPOT ON topic. In summation, Cruz had NO REASON to believe he could get bumcare outlawed. bob gave no evidence to support THAT Cruz COULD.

    Adding, Republican got hit hard in polls BUT TEA even harder along with Cruz.

    ………. SPECIAL NOTATION ……….

    One requirement. Have caught you TOO MANY TIMES rewriting history by re-writing my quotes & taking OUT OF CONTEXT. You must show a acknowledgement of remorse. A MAN OF HONOR would have corrected & done sooooo long ago. YOU REALIZE what position THAT leaves YOU IN.

    TO talk about your SO CALLED accusation, “show the hypocrisy of Senator McCain”, you must enter WITH CLEAN HANDS. YOUR dishonesty IS ………. _ des·pi·ca·ble _ …

  • Bob

    Well 80 something is MORE THAN TO MANY TO GO AROUND THIS CAROUSEL WITH YOU!

    I TOLD YOU WHERE YOU CAN FIND THE INFORMATION AND YOU AREN’T GOING TO GET ANY APOLOGY TO SOOTH YOUR BRUISED EGO……..

    SO GOOD NIGHT WILLIAM!

  • Bill Hedges

    Can’t say you are ashamed for being so dishonest…

    1. “Well 80 something is MORE THAN TO MANY TO GO AROUND THIS CAROUSEL WITH YOU”

    NO. Is you giving FALSE INFORMATION IN WHAT I SAID:

    bob wrote:

    “I thought you said 80 something post is enough?”

    NO bob. You DON’T __ thunk ___. I wrote:

    The count on this article will be over 80 as of this comment. Far exceeding many, many, many comments on so many, many, many articles here

    NOW my actual quote is but a few comments ago on same article. STILL, STILL,STILL, STILL,STILL, STILL,STILL, STILL, STILL, STILL,STILL, STILL,STILL, STILL,STILL, STILL what do you do ??? Don’t come close to saying WHAT I SAID. ___ You are incompetent ____.

    2. “I TOLD YOU WHERE YOU CAN FIND THE INFORMATION AND YOU AREN’T GOING TO GET ANY APOLOGY TO SOOTH YOUR BRUISED EGO……..”

    a.) Already WON THE DISCUSSION that Cruz had no chance of casting out bumcare. HE harmed Party and TEA worse. You certainly could not GIVE evidence either

    b.) I have no “BRUISED EGO”. You are surrounded by DISHONESTY. GLAD TO POINT OUT:

    Have caught you TOO MANY TIMES rewriting history by re-writing my quotes & taking OUT OF CONTEXT. You must show a acknowledgement of remorse. A MAN OF HONOR would have corrected & done sooooo long ago. YOU REALIZE what position THAT leaves YOU IN.

    TO talk about your SO CALLED accusation, “show the hypocrisy of Senator McCain”, you must enter WITH CLEAN HANDS. YOUR dishonesty IS ………. _ des·pi·ca·ble _ …
    __

    If only bob’s dishonesty was limited only to THAT. But NO. EXAMPLE:

    On a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being highest, bob is a (-) 10 for believability:

    Tora, Tora, Tora Bill Hedges Jun 2nd, 2013 at 5:17 pm”
    1.
    “SOME DEEP THINKING” by bob ? N E V E R. INABILITY…
    ______ HELP POLICE !!! ______________ Arrest bob for literature fraud _____ Call 911 _______________
    Fraud
    “A false representation of a matter of fact—whether by words or by conduct, by false or misleading allegations, or by concealment of what should have been disclosed—that deceives and is intended to deceive another so that the individual will act upon it to her or his legal injury.”
    “Fraud is commonly understood as dishonesty calculated for advantage. A person who is dishonest may be called a fraud. In the U.S. legal system, fraud is a specific offense with certain features”
    http://legal-dictionary.t……com/fraud
    SUCH *** an·i·mos·i·ty *** shown. *** in·tim·i·da·tion *** doesn’t work OVER HERE. There is no *** am·bi·gu·i·ty ***. bob owes a apology for:
    A. bob partial quotes me. Leaving out the most pertinent part of my quote:
    “I watch a lot of movies.Have ban most politics from my cable.”
    I wrote:
    I watch a lot of movies. Have ban most politics from my cable. I research online.
    B. bob leaves off KEY PART OF MY QUOTE, then says:
    “I was taught that if you didn’t know what you were talking about as is clearly evident here YOU KEEP YOUR MOUTH SHUT AND NOT EMBARRASS YOURSELF!”
    bob neither *** a·pol·o·gies *** nor shows any sign of remorse. SHAMEFUL…
    __

    This doesn’t go into bob’s “Yogi” & other misquotes or OUT OF CONTEXT.

    POLLS SHOWED madness at government shut down & possible default on government loans, were NOT ACCEPTABLE. Republicans got hit HARD. ……….HARDER HIT TEA.

    bob can say “KICKING THE CAN DOWN THE ROAD LIKE EVERYTHING ELSE THEY DO !” ……. SO……. WHAT !!!…..That “can” is going “down the road” until first of year and maybe a little future. WE Haven’t the votes to stop bumcare. Countless TRIES affirm. IF bumcare is BAD, VOTERS will respond. Period.

    If majority of voters support bumcare at the voting booth (D) win. If first of the year ENOUGH say enough of bumcare, WE WIN.

    THE Supreme Court HAS RULED. I know of NO OTHER cases involving bumcare AT THIS TIME…

  • Bill Hedges

    SOME people honor their commitment to truth. Take honor in their fairness. Take trickery out of their lives. Morally above reproach. Take NO SHORTCUTS.

    Then there is bob…