The Global Warming Hoax Exposed, Again

Many of us have been harshly questioning the junk science behind global warming for years and now a massive blow has been dealt to the hucksters pushing this nonsense. Of course, politicians have been working hard to re-brand global warming by calling it climate change considering the last decade or so of global cooling which has been occurring.

Nonetheless, news is surfacing about dozens and dozens of emails exposed from some of the top climate change “researchers” (liars) from the Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia (UEA) in England. The emails contain numerous conversations about hiding, manipulating and destroying data which is contrary to their view among other things. Keep in mind this is one of the premier research centers for climate change which is often responsible for driving peer-reviewed “science” on this topic and publishing numerous reports claiming that mankind is definitively causing global warming.

In fact, just how important is the Climate Research Unit? The Wikipedia sums it up:

The Climatic Research Unit is a component of the University of East Anglia and is one of the leading institutions concerned with the study of natural and anthropogenic climate change.

It has around thirty research scientists and students and has developed a number of the data sets widely used in climate research, including the global temperature record used to monitor the state of the climate system, as well as statistical software packages and climate models.

This is the group providing the models and statistical basis used around the world to push the climate change lies.

Report on the emails from the Washington Times:

Scientific progress depends on accurate and complete data. It also relies on replication. The past couple of days have uncovered some shocking revelations about the baloney practices that pass as sound science about climate change.

It was announced Thursday afternoon that computer hackers had obtained 160 megabytes of e-mails from the Climate Research Unit (CRU) at the University of East Anglia (UEA) in England. Those e-mails involved communication among many scientific researchers and policy advocates with similar ideological positions all across the world. Those purported authorities were brazenly discussing the destruction and hiding of data that did not support global-warming claims.

Professor Phil Jones, the head of the Climate Research Unit, and professor Michael E. Mann at Pennsylvania State University, who has been an important scientist in the climate debate, have come under particular scrutiny. Among his e-mails, Mr. Jones talked to Mr. Mann about the “trick of adding in the real temps to each series … to hide the decline [in temperature].”

Mr. Mann admitted that he was party to this conversation and lamely explained to the New York Times that “scientists often used the word ‘trick’ to refer to a good way to solve a problem ‘and not something secret.’ ” Though the liberal New York newspaper apparently buys this explanation, we have seen no benign explanation that justifies efforts by researchers to skew data on so-called global-warming “to hide the decline.” Given the controversies over the accuracy of Mr. Mann’s past research, it is surprising his current explanations are accepted so readily.

I’m frankly disgusted in this whole matter for one reason and that is due to the fact that politicians are attempting to impugn legislation such as cap-and-trade on the American people based on a total fabrication put out by fraudulent scientists.

More from the UK Times Online:

If you own any shares in alternative energy companies I should start dumping them NOW. The conspiracy behind the Anthropogenic Global Warming myth (aka AGW; aka ManBearPig) has been suddenly, brutally and quite deliciously exposed after a hacker broke into the computers at the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit (aka CRU) and released 61 megabytes of confidential files onto the internet. (Hat tip: Watts Up With That)

When you read some of those files – including 1079 emails and 72 documents – you realise just why the boffins at CRU might have preferred to keep them confidential. As Andrew Bolt puts it, this scandal could well be “the greatest in modern science”. These alleged emails – supposedly exchanged by some of the most prominent scientists pushing AGW theory – suggest:

Conspiracy, collusion in exaggerating warming data, possibly illegal destruction of embarrassing information, organised resistance to disclosure, manipulation of data, private admissions of flaws in their public claims and much more.

One of the alleged emails has a gentle gloat over the death in 2004 of John L Daly (one of the first climate change sceptics, founder of the Still Waiting For Greenhouse site), commenting:

“In an odd way this is cheering news.”

But perhaps the most damaging revelations – the scientific equivalent of the Telegraph’s MPs’ expenses scandal – are those concerning the way Warmist scientists may variously have manipulated or suppressed evidence in order to support their cause.

The earth is not heating up, it has been cooling for over a decade and the global warming prhpets have been covering it up by purposefully manipulating data. I have been reading for years how the data makes no sense as credible scientist after scientist came forth to denounce the flawed theory of man-made global warming as little more than massaging of the data.

Another summary on these new revelations from one of my favorite sites, Global Warming Hoax:

A server belonging to the University of East Anglia Climate Research Unit was hacked and a large file containing documents and emails was obtained. A number of these documents seem to indicate an attempt to manipulate data and public opinion.

“Wow!” hardly seems to cover it. There is a huge amount of material here and people are still going through it. No one is denying that this data is legit but we have spent some time investigating it ourselves and have concluded that to fake this much data would be extremely difficult. Even the IP numbers of the mail servers shown in the messages check out (on both the to and from email servers). The data is legit, now the question remains what impact will this have and why hasn’t CRU taken action against some of the people involved?

Many of the documents seem to be concerned with hiding scientific results that don’t agree with them. There are also references to destroying data. Some email messages actually suggest that others destroy data before its discovered under a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request (and ironically all of these documents were contained in a folder called “FOIA”). So the next time someone says that “scientists would never fake or manipulate data” here is evidence that they would.

Shameful, there is nothing worse than scientists adhering to a political agenda over the scientific process. Hucksters like Al Gore have been making millions off the carbon credits for years all based on the fraudulent premise that global warming is a fact of life and we’re causing it.

I have never accepted the faulty premise of “climate change” and now I feel even more vindicated. I am just hoping that this becomes bug enough to kill bad legislation like Obama’s cap-and-trade bill which will devastated our economy based on Al Gore’s lies.

See all the emails here for yourself:

Alleged CRU Emails – Searchable

  • Bill Hedges

    I’m afraid saying global warning is a hoax puts us in the category of a Sarah Palin lover, a birther, a believer in lower taxes and smaller government, a thinker who believes the polls are correct and people are against obamas agenda. In other words we are racist. As defined by Jimmy Carter and Bill Crosby. We are against because obama is black. We are nuts and believe the world is flat.

    So say a liberal

    Scientist drill holes in the ice of the poles. They can measure the co2 levels centuries ago. This is one way they come up the history of our planets weather history. Well they found plant life.

    Scientist say poles had melted down to soil to support plant life, yet the ice did not all flow down and flood the world.

    I was working for a health department and heard on television that their was a hole in the ozone. As you can imagine I went to work the next day devastated. I repeated what I was told. Instead of consoling me they laughed. Turns out a new weather satellite had replaced old one. Old one did not measure ‘0’. As you may have noticed this matter is discussed little today.

    Years before Al Gore I watched a debate between A believer (professor) of Global warning and his ex-student. The student asked professor if all you say is true, could reduction of c02 reverse effect. Professor said no.

    Is said next month vote on law between the Countries will fail. Not passing saves $ billions America would have given.

    Al Gore may not have invented the internet but he invented his golden goose.

    Listening to obama today our present war was handled wrong by Bush. Obama doesn’t talk about Iraq.

    What was it that you said about sending more troupes to Iraq ? Who was right obama ? Wasn’t you my friend !

    In fact I haven’t heard the word ‘Iraq’ pass your lips. If Bush had listened to you, you would be saying the word ‘Iraq’ a lot. War still be going on much stronger than you inherited.

    Democrats are talking about tax cuts. Yes pulling a Reagan to pump up jobs. Well is excellent idea but not obama style. A second stimulus bill, energy tax, war tax, and health care. Don’t forget States must increase taxes to pay for Feds forces Medicaid to take all those new recipients. Add bigger government. Tax cuts is not going to get desired results. No way. No how.

    Obama stopped jobs that would have developed under Bush administration. Who but a fool starts a business now that will employ others.
    1. Even if tax cuts take affect, debt National debt will demand higher taxes. 2. A second stimulus bill
    3. State taxes are going to go up. To keep health care bill under $ trillion, a higher income will now be eligible for Medicaid unfunded.
    4. Energy tax could increase utilities 1/3. Everything taking energy to make and transport will cost more.
    5. Health care cost. If you provide and/or if you don’t. If you do provide it goes up because government is taxing private health insurer. If you have you drop and pay penalty.

    So you have all the regular over head plus all these possible new cost, tell me you are rushing to open that new business and/oe add new employees.

    In good times businesses don’t make it. In these times they close. Marginal businesses with these added cost will close.

    I’m waiting obama for you to pull the full grown rabbits from your child hood baseball hat.

    It will take a miracle to create jobs at your job summit. Even 0 interest business loans.

    Congress has super great idea. Lower older people insurance premium and raise young peoples health premium.

    Don’t bother complaining to Congress, Democrats aren’t listening to the public. If they were the health care bill would not pass. Republicans are listening but they are minority. No Republican in Senate voted to let health care go to discussion..

  • Bill Hedges

    The cost of war has been going down. Now is like 4% of GNP, but our Democrat controlled Congress will come up with anything to raise taxes. So look for war tax. They are.

    Aren’t we still paying a war tax on our telephone ? Maybe Nate knows.

    Wait a minute, what is this:

    April 03, 2007
    “Hang Up On War: Claim Your Telephone Tax Rebate”

    “If you are upset that Congress won’t defund the war in Iraq, there’s something you can do: Stop paying taxes. Legally.”

    “The Internal Revenue Service is giving a rebate this year on a telephone war tax. This is one of those line items at the bottom of your phone bill. The tax was instituted in 1898 to help the United States pay for the Spanish-American War. Individuals and businesses have one chance to obtain a refund on this telephone war tax, by asking for it in their 2006 income tax returns.”

    “The Web site lists step-by-step instructions on how to recoup the telephone tax rebate, and recommends donating it to charity.”

    “While Congress and President Bush trade barbs over war funding, with a simple check mark on your tax return, you can help to defund the war. Claim your telephone tax rebate. Let the Pentagon hold a bake sale.”

    I am putting in for my refund. If I can still get.

    So by trickery we are paying a war tax. Although if you are in the know, you can get a rebate. Maybe.

    Now another war tax ??? Isn’t that double taxation or something ?? Wonder how much they get from long distance.

    Now Congress gotta have a lot of money to spend. You know liquor tax could be raised ? Pork pork pork projects out the ears to try and get re-elected. Price you got to pay when you have a agenda public don’t like. And votes in Congress cost $100 million.

    How about bubble gum tax increase ? ?

    I bet they are not adding oil to our national reserve any more, but opting for cash money. Preferable in euros not dollars. Seen how the dollar is in free fall.

    Obama had a gala party was it Wednesday ? Couple got in uninvited. Lots of movie stars and big name news people.

    One very big name was a no show. Heck she’s been seen with Sarah Palin lately anyhow. But would have thought Oprah would have attended. Her friend did.

  • Bill Hedges

    Obama pardon the turkeys following in originator’s footprints who was elder Bush.

    Is obama continuing the mistake elder Bush made? ‘No new taxes’, with slight deviation by obama, ‘no new taxes except for those making $250,000 +’.

    “Obama to plead US case at global warming summit”

    By H. JOSEF HEBERT, Associated Press Writer H. Josef Hebert, Associated Press Writer – 27 mins ago

    WASHINGTON –” President Barack Obama will commit the United States to substantial cuts in greenhouse gas pollution over the next decade — despite resistance in Congress over higher costs — when he travels to a major climate conference in Copenhagen next month.”

    “Obama will attend the start of the conference Dec. 9 before heading to Oslo to accept the Nobel Peace Prize. He will “put on the table” a U.S. commitment to cut emissions by 17 percent over the next decade, on the way to reducing heat-trapping pollution by 80 percent by mid-century, the White House said.”

    “Obama’s promise of greenhouse emissions cuts will require Congress to pass complex climate legislation that the administration says will include an array of measures to ease the price impact. The bills before Congress, for example, would have the government provide polluters free emissions allowances in the early years of the transition from fossil fuels, as well as direct payments to many consumers facing high costs.”

    “Carol Browner, Obama’s assistant for energy and climate change, on Wednesday cited a Congressional Budget Office study that said there would be $173-a-year estimated cost to the average household by 2020 if greenhouse gases were cut by 17 percent from 2005 levels. But the CBO analysis also said that if cost-blunting measures in the legislation were not taken into account, the cost to households could jump to $890 “

    “Other studies conducted by pro-industry groups have put the average household costs between $900 to more than $3,000 a year, although many of those studies do not take into account new energy conservation efforts and assume a more pessimistic view of new technology development that could bring actual consumer costs down..”
    “China’s top climate envoy said Wednesday his nation would seek binding pollution targets for developed countries but reject similar requirements for itself at the summit. Yu Qingtai said it would be unfair for all countries to be required to combat global warming since most of the environmental damage has been caused by developed nations during their industrialization over the past 100 to 200 years.”

    “The high-profile delegation is intended to reinforce Obama’s stance, despite the bitter debate in Congress. The House narrowly passed legislation requiring a cap on greenhouse gases from power plants and industry, but it’s still unclear whether Senate Democrats will be able to muster the 60 votes needed to approve a similar bill.”

    I love this article. What bull found between the lines.

    One of obama’s crazy czars believe America should spread our wealth. Well here is one way.

    Here is classic obama-sell-out-America and kiss China’s butt. What a thing for me to say. Let’s reason this out:

    “China’s top climate envoy said Wednesday his nation would seek binding pollution targets for developed countries but reject similar requirements for itself at the summit.”

    So America is going to finance other Countries because of our pollution. We are going to increase our cost and products we sell. However China won’t. Of course China will vote for that. Our stuff higher, China’s stuff not. Good work obama.!!! And America is deeper in debt to China.

    Vote in Senate is postponed till spring. Will we have enough Senators elected by then to pull a ‘League of Nations’???

  • Bill Hedges

    A Back day on black friday in stock market today. A Country in debt may lead to a big loss.

    On this Thanksgiving holiday stop this borrowing and pork spending Congress.

    The market opens in 17 minues. How bad is not known yet.

  • Bill Hedges

    “Daily Presidential Tracking Poll”
    Wednesday, November 25, 2009 ?

    “The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Wednesday shows that 26% of the nation’s voters Strongly Approve of the way that Barack Obama is performing his role as President. Forty-one percent (41%) Strongly Disapprove giving Obama a Presidential Approval Index rating of -15. This is the second straight day at -15, the lowest Approval Index rating yet measured for President Obama .“

    “Right Direction or Wrong Track
    31% Say U.S. Heading In Right Direction”

    Wednesday, November 25, 2009

    “Generic Congressional Ballot “
    “Republicans Post Seven-Point Lead on Generic Ballot”

    Tuesday, November 24, 2009

    “Republican candidates have extended their lead over Democrats to seven points, their biggest lead since early September, in the latest edition of the Generic Congressional Ballot.”

    “The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey shows that 44% would vote for their district’s Republican congressional candidate while 37% would opt for his or her Democratic opponent.”

    If you aren’t got nothing good to say…
    Then rub in the bad new…

    “Now, we’re caught in this trap again. The premise is, what is your “hope.” My hope, and please understand me when I say this. I disagree fervently with the people on our side of the aisle who have caved and who say, “Well, I hope he succeeds. We’ve got to give him a chance.” Why? They didn’t give Bush a chance in 2000. Before he was inaugurated the search-and-destroy mission had begun. I’m not talking about search-and-destroy, but I’ve been listening to Barack Obama for a year-and-a-half. I know what his politics are. I know what his plans are, as he has stated them. I don’t want them to succeed.”

    Rush Limbaugh: I Hope Obama Fails January 16, 2009

    Rush dead on target. People don’t want obama to succeed either. Nombers tell the story…

    With up coming ‘Gobal not warming conference’ coming up, wonder if obama will brag about the $ Billions of yens we will borrow to cost American’s jobs to help other Countries. That should help lower his polls more.

    obama’s approval rating drop is breaking records.

  • Bill Hedges

    November 20, 2009
    “Obama Job Approval Down to 49%”
    “President becomes fourth fastest to slip below the majority approval level”

    by Jeffrey M. Jones

    PRINCETON, NJ — “The latest Gallup Daily tracking results show 49% of Americans approving of the job Barack Obama is doing as president, putting him below the majority approval level for the first time in his presidency.”

    “Of the post-World War II presidents, Obama now is the fourth fastest to drop below the majority approval level, doing so in his 10th month on the job. Gerald Ford dropped below 50% approval during his third month in office, and Bill Clinton did so in his fourth month. Ronald Reagan, like Obama, also dropped below 50% in his 10th month in office, though Reagan’s drop occurred a few days sooner in that month (Nov. 13-16, 1981) than did Obama’s (Nov. 17-19, 2009)”.

    “But all presidents except John Kennedy dropped below the majority approval level at some point in their presidencies, and all recovered after the first time below this mark to go back above 50% approval.”

    All recovered to 50%. Think obama will ????


    Unless he sees the light soon, and becomes a Conservative.

  • Bill Hedges

    Gee, obama dropped below 50% quicker than the two Bush men.


    But Bill Clinton did it in 4 months..

  • Bill Hedges

    Both liberals and Conservatives in Congress wants Geithner gone. Hummm.

    Too bad for the guy who can’t do his own taxes.

    It won’t do much good to just kick him out. At least Dodd and Frank must follow. How about tops in House and Senate leading them.

    What do they about cutting off the head ? The body will fall.

    Let Hussein stay as a figure head.
    Here are 10 videos on conspiracy of global warming.

    One of the videos reminded me of show I once watched on ‘the Tonight Show’. A scientists was talking about temperature gauges was set on asphalt and across from air conditioner’s exhaust. After commercial break, the guy was gone. Jay was host.