Final Mason-Dixon polls show tight battleground races

Share/Save/Bookmark

Final Mason-Dixon polls show tight battleground races

The final Mason-Dixon battleground polls are out across the board showing ties within the margin of error, or extremely close races in each of the important swing states this time around. Mason-Dixon’s battleground polls were fairly accurate in 2004 so it’s worth nothing their final polling, if you put much stock in it.

Here’s the rundown of Mason-Dixon’s latest numbers out this afternoon, their final polling before Election Day tomorrow:

Colorado: Obama 49, McCain 44, Undecided 4
Florida: Obama 47, McCain 45, Undecided 7
Nevada: Obama 47, McCain 43, Undecided 8
Pennsylvania: Obama 47, McCain 43, Undecided 9
Virginia: Obama 47, McCain 44, Undecided 9
Ohio: McCain 47, Obama 45, Undecided 6
Missouri: McCain 47, Obama 46, Undecided 5
North Carolina: McCain 49, Obama 46, Undecided 5

As Brad Coker, who runs the Mason-Dixon poll, notes, the vast majority of the undecided voters in these states are whites, so take for what it’s worth.

The trouble spots I see for McCain are Colorado, Nevada, and possibly Virginia at this point. The trouble spots for Obama in this round might include Ohio, Missouri, and North Carolina where they’ve been spending a lot of time trying to turn those states.

Pennsylvania is a true toss-up here. Polls have showed Obama leading steadily, however, they’re trending slightly toward McCain. Internal polling, from what I’ve heard, shows that both campaigns believe Pennsylvania is a bit closer than the public polls, though I have no evidence to support that notion. Current Pennsylvania Governor, and Obama surrogate, Ed Rendell has been worried in the remaining days that Pennsylvania could swing to McCain, thus his continued request for more Obama rallies and campaign stops in the state.

If these polls are even remotely accurate, the race is very tight in all these states.

Sound off, how do you think each of these states will end up?

  • Share/Save/Bookmark
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...
Leave a comment »
Visit the You Decide Politics Store »
Related Posts:

Note: The comments section below contains opinions and views from the online community at YouDecidePolitics.com, read at your own risk! Please don't assume that YouDecidePolitics.com agrees with or endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand, this is an open forum. Be respectful or posts will be removed.

8 Responses to “Final Mason-Dixon polls show tight battleground races”

  1. Nate, what do you mean by “The vast majority of undecided in these states are whites, so take for what it’s worth”. What do you think about the undecided whites?

    Report Comment

  2. As Brad Coker, who runs the Mason-Dixon poll, notes, the vast majority of the undecided voters in these states are whites, so take for what it’s worth…..Brad Coker said it not Nate

    Report Comment

  3. Brad Coker is quoted by Nate to substantiate a point. I very strongly beleive Nate knows what Brad Coker means before he quoted him. I’m asking the one who did the quotation, please.

    Report Comment

  4. Sorry I do appreciate other’s responses but they MUST try to respond to my request or answer my question and not to redicule me.

    Report Comment

  5. Pats,

    Here is what it stems from, in Coker’s own words:

    J. Bradford Coker, who oversaw the survey, said the ultimate outcome in Virginia and elsewhere might hinge on whether undecided white voters are willing to vote for Obama, who would be the nation’s first African American president.

    http://hamptonroads.com/2.....poll-shows

    There he was speaking of Virginia but stated it holds true in other battleground states as well.

    The big question is where will the undecided voters turn?

    Coker pointed it out because McCain does good with white voters. Therefore, if those trends translate to the undecideds, many may break for McCain.

    Just trying to bring you ALL the information on Election Day eve.

    Report Comment

  6. Pats–Showing a mistake is not redicule. And was not meant to be

    Report Comment

  7. Thank you very much Nate and Bill.
    Nate, I now understand. At first, I thought you were pointing at whites being the undecided.
    Bill, don’t mind me. I misread your point.

    Report Comment

  8. Pats- no problem

    Report Comment

Leave a Reply

You can use these XHTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Trackback URL

Visited 1552 times, 1 so far today
Blog Powered by
 WordPress
Entries (RSS)
Comments (RSS)

This site requires a modern browser
and at least 1024x768 screen resolution
to display properly