Media Becomes More Critical of Clinton

Following Florida and Michigan recent rejection of a revote, the media has become critical of Hillary Clinton’s chances of seizing the Democratic nomination. Take for instance NPR, which issued an article entitled “Media Asks Is This the Beginning of the End?”

NPR, March 21, 2008:

Jim Vandehei and Mike Allen at wrote today that “One big fact has largely been lost in the recent coverage of the Democratic presidential race: Hillary Rodham Clinton has virtually no chance of winning.”

Former Republican and Democratic strategist (in fact, he worked for the Clintons) Dick Morris said on Fox News yesterday that “First of all, he is the Democratic Party nominee. There is no way that Hillary Clinton is going to either beat him in elected delegates or persuade the superdelegates. He is the Democratic nominee.” (Morris did add that he thinks the Wright issue will sink Obama in the fall.)

Jack Cafferty, of the Cafferty File on CNN, used the phrase when talking about the Richardson endorsement and the delegate count. Specifically, Cafferty said Richardson’s status as a special delegate gives other special delegates the excuse to come out and support Obama now, despite the Wright controversy.

Toby Harnden, The Daily Telegraph’s U.S. editor since 2006, writes that Clinton has “no realistic path” to the nomination. “Unless Obama is, as the now-jailed former Louisiana governor Edwin Edwards once put it, ‘caught in bed with either a dead girl or a live boy’ she cannot overcome his pledged delegate lead.”

Clinton supporters are attempting to combat this recent media cynicism with a different perspective on the race. One different perspective comes from Senator Evan Bayh of Indiana, who backs Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton for president. Senator Bayh has proposed evaluating the candidates based on their potential electoral votes.

Katharine Q. Seelye of the New York Times reports, March 24, 2008:

“So who carried the states with the most Electoral College votes is an important factor to consider because ultimately, that’s how we choose the president of the United States,” Mr. Bayh said on CNN’s “Late Edition.”

In a primary, of course, electoral votes are not relevant, but the Clinton campaign is trying to use them as an unofficial measure of strength.

So far, Mrs. Clinton has won states with a total of 219 Electoral College votes, not counting Florida and Michigan, while Mr. Obama has won states with a total of 202 electoral votes.